De La Salle University - DLSU vs University of Santo Tomas Manila - UST vs University of Manila - UDM vs De La Salle - College of Saint Benilde - DSL-CSB vs FEU Institute of Technology - FEU
Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality education and academic excellence
- +Supportive professors and engaging learning environment
- +Vibrant campus life and community spirit
- +Strong academic programs and updated curriculum
- +Beautiful and expansive campus with vibrant community
- +Emphasis on tradition and faith
- +Innovative and forward-thinking approach to student development
- +Welcoming and supportive campus environment with accessible faculty
- +Strong academic standards and scholarship opportunities
- +Vibrant and inclusive community
- +Exposure to diverse perspectives
- +Distinctive and specialized courses
- +High-quality facilities and competent faculty
- +Effective education and proper guidance
- +Innovative teaching methodologies and future-ready educator focus
- +Strong curriculum and expert professors in education
- +Development of well-rounded, 21st-century teachers
- +Excellent support for personal growth and future career development.
- +Valued guidance and mentorship from staff and professors.
- +Opportunities for global success and advancement.
- -Administrative and management issues prioritize the academic calendar over student well-being.
- -Students feel uncared for by the university's response to external disruptions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of qualified professors and insufficient facilities.
- -Overload of redundant subjects and lackluster programs.
- -Minimal competitive program activities.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods bore students.
- -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
- -Administrative & management issues are consistently problematic.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Limited opportunities for practical application and skill development are appreciated the least.
This institution presents a varied performance across key metrics. Its strongest areas are internationality, scoring an impressive 4.75, and student life, rated at 4.375. Professors and value also received strong scores of 4.25. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.375. Facilities and location received solid mid-range scores.
This university scores well across most surveyed areas, with student life emerging as its strongest aspect. Professors and value also received high marks, reflecting positively on the academic experience and return on investment. Accommodation presents the lowest-rated category, suggesting potential areas for improvement. Location and internationality are also considered strengths, contributing to a well-rounded university experience.
Analyzing the provided ratings reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors achieve a notably high score of 4, indicating excellent academic guidance. Conversely, the location and facilities are the weakest points, each scoring a low 2. Student life and internationality also receive moderate ratings of 2.5, while accommodation and value for money present a more favorable picture with scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively.
This institution garners outstanding scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation. Student Life and Internationality are also well-regarded, receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Location is the sole category not reaching the highest tier, though it still scores favorably at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, particularly excelling in its academic and infrastructural provisions.
The university excels in its **facilities**, receiving a perfect score. Areas like **professors**, **location**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated moderately at a 3, indicating room for improvement. **Student life** and **value** both received positive scores of 4, suggesting these are strong points for prospective students.
This institution shines particularly bright in **professors** and **value**, both receiving perfect scores, and boasts excellent marks for **location**, **student life**, and **internationality**. Its **accommodation** also scores well. The sole area for potential improvement lies in its **facilities**, which received a rating of 3.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieved perfect scores in every category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students, with no discernible weak areas to report.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~89% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students praise quality education, academic facilities, and supportive professors. A small minority (~11%) of reviews express concerns regarding student well-being during emergencies.
With an average rating of 4.53/5, ~90%+ of reviews are positive, highlighting a beautiful campus, strong academic programs (medicine, education, arts, nursing, pharmacy), and supportive faculty. A few mention minor administrative improvements needed.
Two out of three reviews are positive, highlighting innovation, a good learning environment, and competitive programs. One review expressed concerns about qualified professors and facilities.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly praised for its vibrant, inclusive community and diverse student body. Students appreciate the enrichment gained from varied perspectives and endorse the institution for specialized, unconventional courses fostering personal growth.
The single review is positive, giving a 4/5 rating. It highlights high-quality facilities and competent faculty for computer studies and engineering. Negative feedback is absent.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight the university's effectiveness in developing well-rounded, future-ready educators with innovative approaches and excellent faculty expertise.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students report high satisfaction, highlighting the university's role in personal growth and career development.
De La Salle University and DLSU are entertaining and fulfilling to the utmost. It was great to learn my degree in Computer Science, classes were hard, however it was satisfying to see the professors challenge us in many ways. Most of my classmates would agree that DLSU does have a local atmosphere. There’s always something happening on campus, from unexpected games to events organized by various student associations. I had helpful Profs, who went out of their way to ensure that you excel. The campus amenities are also of excellent quality, the best being the library that I practically visited every day for study purposes.
This is the main factor that pushed me to choose UST-FMS in the end. When you look at the number of passers vs. the non-passers for the boards, you’ll see that UST produces the most number of doctors (among the well-known schools). This fact continues to amaze me because it shows that UST-FMS is capable of turning an ordinary person to someone extraordinary after four years of training. Con # 1: Major adjustment for non-UST graduates. If you’re a social butterfly, then this wouldn’t be a con for you at all. But if you’re a bit socially-challenged like me, I think that one of the biggest obstacles in med school is finding friends. It takes effort and time especially if you’re surrounded by people who’ve known each other from undergrad. Being one out of the four UPCN students that enrolled in UST, it wasn’t very easy for me to adjust. Good thing I ended up in the same subsection with one of my former batchmates, which made the matter of making new friends less pressing. But do not let this can hinder you! In time, I was able to adjust and make new friends (thank God!). Pro # 2: Excellent Faculty. Majority of the faculty members really “do their thing”. Meaning, most of them are really good at what they teach. Though there are a few here and there, who left me unimpressed. Nonetheless, I can assure you that most of our lectures, lab sessions, and SGDs, are handled well; and you will really learn a lot especially from the really intellectual teachers. Most of the faculty members and staff are approachable, too! Matters can be brought out into the open and inquiries are entertained. One thing I really appreciated about the departments is that they promptly posted the answer key after each and every quiz/exam. What’s more is that when you disagree about a certain answer, you can approach the departments with a letter for clarification, and if you are able to provide evidence (usually from the reference textbooks) then they will change/ consider the answer. My favorite so far is our faculty for physiology because they really handle the subject well. Almost all the concepts are more or less retained because they have this course structure that encourages repetition for reinforcement. For instance, for one topic, we have one short quiz, one figure-review quiz, a lab session (depending on the topic), a long exam, and a shifting exam. Con # 2: Some Treat Us Like Children. We have this “attitude” component in our grade, which is more or less used to elicit good behavior. We get penalized for being absent (unexcused), for leaving the room dirty, and stuff like that. While I recognize that this comes with good intent from the faculty, I hate being treated like a child. The use of external reinforcement (grades) is too elementary for me. Aren’t we old enough to be trusted to have the maturity and innate drive to do the right things? Nonetheless, you’ll be surprised to see that even if you are already in grad school, some people just really don’t mature enough. There are students who still tend to be noisy during class, be ruthless and inconsiderate… you get the point. I just take refuge in this fact that some people really need this “attitude” thing to behave well. Pro # 3: Good Facilities. The first thing that struck me during my first week in med school was that each and every room in UST-FMS had projectors and Mac computers for the lectures! I can assure you that the state of the facilities in the school somehow compensates for the BIG tuition fee. As an example, let me point out that we have a Medical Informatics Center where you can do research work using TOUCH SCREEN computers! Like other schools, we also have a library, auditoriums, a classroom, some chairs… you get the point. We also have access to the other facilities of the whole university. And just to add, we have a good “outside” environment too!! Nothing beats walking along lover’s lane, breathing (somewhat) fresh air, and basking in that university feel. If there’s one complaint I have about our building, it’s that the med cafe is too small for the student population and the food is too expensive!!! But this is saved by the fact that Dapitan (the haven of cheap street food and canteens) is just a few steps away from UST. With only 40 or so pesos, you have a hearty meal of sisig/buttered chicken/adobo/name-it-you-got-it. Haha. You just really need to look for the “safe” carinderias which serve clean food. Con # 3: Student Population. Our batch is composed of 500+ individuals which is a tad bit too many for me. Although the classrooms are able to accommodate us all, I think that 100+ students under one wing are too much. There are a select-few classrooms that I find “unconducive” for learning, because of its size and layout. But generally, it’s A-Ok. It just sometimes bothers me that we are so many. I think that our batch, in particular, went a little over the limit of the number of students allowed. Not sure, though. So I guess if you learn well in a small class, and you find yourself unwilling/unable to adjust to a HUGE class, then UST isn’t the school for you. Pro and Con # 4: Pseudo-Traditional “Spoonfeeding” Curriculum. The general view about UST is that it has a traditional curriculum, focused more on the theoretical aspect with lectures and exams. This is mostly true because as compared to other med schools, we are really battered with consecutive quizzes and exams to evaluate our learning. But actually, it’s not wholly traditional! There is also a PBL aspect incorporated into the curriculum in the form of SGDs, lab conferences, and the SCOFYL (you’ll know what this is soon enough! And personally, I prefer this pseudo-traditional approach. I think that one needs to really understand the theories before applying them. The UST curriculum gives us that, as evidenced by the high board passing rate. I have heard that our graduates also do well in their clerkships/internships/ residencies. Another issue about the school’s curriculum is the spoon-feeding. I will not deny this. Coming from UP, I readily observed that UST definitely spoon-feeds in the sense that almost everything is prepared for us. Almost all departments are fond of giving hand-outs (which are very useful, if I may add). But really, other than this, you’re on your own. At the end of the day, it all boils down to how much a student is willing to take in and study. The only con I see with the curriculum is that it is somewhat conducive to the G.C. (aka grade conscious) culture. Which, in my opinion, shouldn’t be the case. Studying should be driven by learning and not solely by high grades. But that’s just me generalizing and being ideal. It all really depends on what kind of student you want to be! To be honest, I’m also guilty of being grade-hungry sometimes, but I really make a conscious effort not to. And because I’m sleeeeeeepy and out of ideas, I’ll just leave this post at this point and add to the list in the following days. I hope that this little guide helps you come up with the best decision! Just always remember that med school should fit you perfectly like a velvet glove. Go to a school that you know you will love, because when things got tough (academically), having a good school environment and school pride will be one of the major factors that will push you to finish med.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show