Universidad Técnica de Comercialización y Desarrollo - UTCD vs Strate School of Design vs European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla vs Gratia Christian College - GCC vs Curtin University Mauritius - CURTIN

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (4.50)
Universidad Técnica de Comercialización y Desarrollo - UTCD: wins 0/6 categories
Strate School of Design: wins 0/6 categories
European University Kallos Tuzla - EU Kallos Tuzla: wins 0/6 categories
Gratia Christian College - GCC: wins 0/6 categories
Curtin University Mauritius - CURTIN: wins 1/6 categories
Mauritius Institute of Education - Mie: wins 2/6 categories
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences: wins 3/6 categories
Comparing
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
3.00
3.50
Win
Location
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
3.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.00
4.50
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
2.00
4.50
Win
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
3.50
Value
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Win
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Friendly and accessible professors
  • +Good learning opportunities
  • +Modern facilities and location

Nothing to show

  • +Strong employability support and career readiness.
  • +Relevant and up-to-date academic programs.
  • +Professional and accommodating faculty.

Nothing to show

  • +Flexible online format and structure
  • +Career-focused and practical learning
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a major source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff leave students feeling neglected.

Nothing to show

  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency regarding school policies and decisions.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for modern learning.
  • -Unsupportive or inaccessible administrative and teaching staff.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This academic institution received consistently low ratings across all surveyed categories. Areas like facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all scored zero. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to highlight, as the university appears to perform poorly across the board according to this assessment.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its location, receiving a perfect score of 5. Professors are also highly rated at 4.5. Conversely, facilities and student life are areas with moderate ratings at 3. Accommodations and internationality sit comfortably in the mid-range. The overall value of the university is positively assessed at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5 based on 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the modern design, great location, and the kindness and professionalism of professors and staff. Some suggest improvements for certain faculties regarding curriculum and practical experience.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight satisfaction with employability services, workshops, and career preparation. Some note challenges with off-campus accommodation and limited campus activities.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
0%
0%
67%
0%
100%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My Experience

The program has been tailored to accommodate the ever-changing world of tech and fully equips pupils with the relevant industry specific knowledge they require as well as a broadened perspective on a plethora of subjects through electives and workshops. The campus is very small and there are very few activities to participate in. This makes the school-life balance hard to maintain as the semester is very intensive and requires consistent study. The lecturers are very professional, accommodating, eager to help and approachable.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close