State College of Technology - FATEC vs Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado - FAAP vs Faculty of Technology and Administration Paulista - FIAP vs Ironhack vs Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Faculty of Technology and Administration Paulista - FIAP (5.00)
State College of Technology - FATEC: wins 2/4 categories
Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado - FAAP: wins 0/4 categories
Faculty of Technology and Administration Paulista - FIAP: wins 0/4 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/4 categories
Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa: wins 0/4 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Event Management
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Location
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Professors
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Internationality
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Value
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Caring, genius professors
  • +High quality education

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and engaging courses
  • +High quality programming education
  • +Recognized as a top university
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Reliable and competent academic support
  • +Affordable tuition fees
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency create dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Poor administrative and management support leads to student frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum fail to engage or adequately prepare students.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts an impressive score for its professors, location, and international student experience, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also strong with 4-star ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3 stars. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, with particular strengths in academic quality and its global appeal.

Nothing to show

Across all evaluated aspects, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This suggests a consistent lack of perceived strength in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no areas standing out as particularly positive or negative, the university presents a uniform performance across all surveyed categories.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic environment and student experience. Professors and student life both garnered top marks at 4.5, matched by an excellent location also rated 4.5. While facilities are solid at 3.5, internationality stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. Accommodations and value are also favorably rated at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise good professors who care about them and their exceptional knowledge. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

The sole reviewer rated FIAP 5/5 stars, highlighting excellent professors, students, and courses. This single positive review indicates a very favorable student experience, with no negative feedback reported.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a reliable academic support system and affordable tuition fees.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
50%
4★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close