UIC Barcelona vs Universitat d'Alacant vs Universidad Miguel Hernández - UMH vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Escola d'Art i Superior de Disseny d'Alacant - EASDA
Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Beautiful, convenient, and well-equipped campus with natural elements.
- +Kind, passionate, and supportive teachers fostering good student relationships.
- +Positive student atmosphere with engaging activities and a welcoming city.
- +Strong academic and research support from supervisors and diverse, interdisciplinary programs.
- +Modern facilities, including well-equipped labs and practice areas.
- +Supportive and collaborative student environment.
- +Real-world work experience and strong career support.
- +Excellent professors and a supportive, modern learning environment.
- +International student community and enriching social connections.
- +Professional, involved faculty and familiar atmosphere
- +Diverse design program offerings
- +Potential for improvement in facilities and organization
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world projects and industry focus
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive and personalized learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Inadequate academic training and poor teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of transparency and fair handling of controversies.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities that detract from the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are frequently criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be lacking.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and difficult access.
- -Disappointing academic programs and limited practical application.
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative burdens and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Student life stands out as the university's strongest attribute, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating. Other evaluated aspects, including facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value, all fall within a generally positive range, indicating a well-rounded experience with room for improvement in housing.
This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities**, earning a 4 out of 5. Student Life also scores well at 3.875. The university's **Accommodations** present the most significant area for improvement, rated at 3.125. Other aspects, including Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, fall within a mid-range of 3.4 to 3.55.
An excellent overall performance is indicated by these university ratings. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, boasting a high score of 4.71. Facilities and Professors also received strong marks. The weakest area, by comparison, is **Location**, with a score of 3.87, suggesting this may be a point of consideration.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and accommodation are also highly rated, suggesting a comfortable and well-equipped environment. However, the location is a significant weakness, scoring only one out of five, and professor quality, while decent, is the lowest-rated academic aspect.
Nothing to show
This institution receives a well-rounded set of ratings. **Professors** are the highest-rated area, closely followed by **Student Life** and **Location**. **Accommodations** emerge as the weakest point among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a generally positive student experience.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 63 reviews, ~86% praise the beautiful, convenient campus and friendly, passionate teachers. A small ~5% of feedback points to concerns about teaching quality and exam structure.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic support, research opportunities, and interdisciplinary programs. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentions concerns with campus facilities and university ethics.
With an average rating of 4.43/5, ~96% of 23 reviews are positive. Students highlight rewarding academic and personal development, practical work experience, and an international environment. There is no negative feedback recorded.
With a 3.25 average rating, most (around 75%) student feedback is positive, highlighting professional teachers and a good learning experience. However, about 25% of reviews mention significant issues with outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% giving high ratings. Students highlight an enriching, practical learning experience, international environment, and strong professional preparation. There is no negative feedback.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Universitat d'Alacant enhances the energy of its campus community through a diverse selection of extracurricular activities. The university fosters an atmosphere that nurtures creativity and individual development, reflected in its modern facilities and dynamic learning environments. Professors, characterized by their passion and expertise, implement creative teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
