IE University vs UIC Barcelona vs Universitat d'Alacant vs Universidad Miguel Hernández - UMH vs Escola d'Art i Superior de Disseny d'Alacant - EASDA
Side-by-side comparison from 315 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and personalized guidance for academic and career success.
- +Excellent facilities, enriching coursework, and practical skill development.
- +Abundant opportunities and networking for future career prospects.
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
- +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
- +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
- +Excellent campus environment and facilities
- +Supportive and passionate teaching staff
- +Vibrant student life and city atmosphere
- +Strong academic and research support
- +Interdisciplinary and research-oriented programs
- +Modern facilities and collaborative environment
- +Professional, involved instructors and familiar atmosphere.
- +Diverse design degree specializations.
- +Improving organization and future outlook.
- +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty providing strong support for career readiness.
- +Diverse and welcoming multicultural environment fostering collaboration and soft skills.
- +Accessible instructors and helpful staff dedicated to student success and growth.
Nothing to show
- -Disappointing academic quality and misleading marketing.
- -Poor program management and perceived lack of flexibility.
- -Uninspiring campus environment and limited student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
- -Teaching quality and academic training are lacking.
- -Outdated facilities and inefficient administration are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues, including retroactive law application.
- -Outdated and insufficient facilities negatively impacting campus life.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities with difficult access.
- -Disappointing academic experience despite qualified teachers.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support for internships and career services is a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and unaddressed student grievances are disliked.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality stands out with an impressive rating, closely followed by an excellent score for Location. Student life and the quality of Professors also receive high marks. However, Accommodations represent the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Value for money and Facilities are rated favorably, though not as high as the top-performing categories.
The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.
This institution demonstrates particularly strong performance in Student Life, achieving a rating of 3.95. Internationality and Facilities also received favorable scores. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.27, indicating room for improvement in this category. The remaining aspects, including Professors, Location, and Value, received moderate to good ratings.
This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with its **Facilities** standing out as the highest-rated area. Student Life, Professors, and Internationality also receive strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest aspect of the university's offerings. While Location and Value are rated moderately well, improvements in the accommodation sector could significantly enhance the student experience.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates no specific strengths or weaknesses were identified within facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value for money. The consistent score across every aspect suggests a need for comprehensive review and development across all operational and academic areas.
This institution garners significant praise, particularly for its professors, internationality, and location, all receiving scores above 4.4. Student life and value also score highly. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a considerably lower rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, though improvements could be made in its housing provisions.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive faculty, and enriching academic/networking opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about academic standards or the campus environment.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.
The vast majority of reviews (~95%) are positive, highlighting the campus and study programs. A small portion of feedback (~5%) points to concerns with teaching quality.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~74%) for academic and research support, interdisciplinary programs, and a conducive environment. A small percentage (~4.6%) of reviews mention some limitations in campus facilities.
Two of three reviews are positive, highlighting professional teachers and learning opportunities. One review is negative, citing poor facilities and access, despite mentioning personalized treatment. The average rating is 3/5.
With a 4.54 average rating, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising enthusiastic faculty, a diverse and supportive environment, and strong career preparation. A small minority (~5%) express dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
Nothing to show
I chose this university because some friends who had studied there had told me it was a great experience, and it's true. It has excellent facilities and a faculty that always encourages you to do your best. They motivate you a lot and guide you in a way I hadn't seen before. They are very approachable professors and are attentive to how they can optimize your studies. I made good friends there, I have good memories of that experience, and I might even pursue some further studies because it left a very positive impression on me.
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Universitat d'Alacant enhances the energy of its campus community through a diverse selection of extracurricular activities. The university fosters an atmosphere that nurtures creativity and individual development, reflected in its modern facilities and dynamic learning environments. Professors, characterized by their passion and expertise, implement creative teaching approaches.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
Nothing to show
