Universidad del valle de México - UVM vs Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez - UACJ vs Universidad Autónoma de Chihuahua - UACH vs Universidad Tecnológica de Chihuahua - UTCH vs Instituto Tecnológico de Chihuahua II - ITCH II
Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Accessible education via scholarships
- +Engaging professors and diverse academic offerings
- +Extracurricular activities and community involvement
- +Strong academics and diverse extracurricular activities
- +Valuable and accessible sports facilities
- +Freedom in study choices and flexible learning
- +Great teachers and well-prepared faculty
- +Good campus facilities and large university size
- +Opportunities for participation in sports
- +Industry-ready facilities and equipment
- +Skilled and knowledgeable teaching staff
- +Career-focused programs and practical training
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Accessible tuition fees
- +Encouraging entrepreneurial spirit
- +Good teacher formation
- +Infrastructure improvements
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- -Persistent, intrusive recruitment calls.
- -Ineffective and overwhelming communication channels.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and guidance from instructors is a problem.
- -Outdated and dirty facilities are a major concern.
- -Poor teaching quality is frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of international presence is a drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content can be irrelevant or not align with current industry needs.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of engagement and effectiveness in teaching is a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
Academic strengths emerge clearly, with Professors and Student Life receiving the highest marks. Facilities and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Value for money falls in the middle of the spectrum.
An assessment of the institution reveals a consistent performance across all surveyed areas, with no standout strengths or weaknesses evident. Each category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received identical zero ratings. This uniform evaluation suggests areas for development are present throughout the university's offerings.
Assessing this institution reveals a mixed performance across key areas. The university excels in its **location**, receiving a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation** and **internationality** are identified as areas needing significant improvement, scoring lowest. Ratings for **facilities**, **professors**, and **student life** fall in the mid-range, while **value** also receives a moderate score.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. This indicates a consistent performance level with no distinct strengths or weaknesses identified in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or overall value. The data presents a uniform lack of positive or negative distinction across every assessed aspect.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, achieving a high rating of 4.5. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received positive feedback, all scoring 4. However, the university's internationality is identified as a weaker area, with a rating of 2.5. Ratings for professors and overall value are moderate, both at 3.5.
This institution presents a uniform profile, with no single area standing out as particularly strong or weak. Every aspect surveyed, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, received a rating of zero. Consequently, there are no specific strengths or weaknesses to highlight based on these evaluations.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
Around 54% of reviews are positive, highlighting good resources and engaging professors. The average rating is 3.71/5, with minimal negative feedback.
University feedback is largely positive (~100%), with students appreciating academic quality, diverse events, and study freedom. Minor areas for improvement include cafeteria food variety.
About 43% of reviews are positive, citing good teachers and campus facilities. However, ~14% of feedback highlights issues with unprepared teachers in specific faculties and a lack of student housing.
With an average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the excellent teaching staff, well-equipped industry-standard facilities, and diverse career opportunities.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students praise inspiring teachers, a helpful library with ample resources, and the university's affordability. Some note a need for facility improvements.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, one out of two reviews is positive. Students praise infrastructure and teacher formation, though some note insufficient equipment for practices. Negative feedback is minimal.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
The International Business Administration degree at Universidad del Valle de México is an academic journey that will strenghten the skills that you have while traching you diverse ways to apply them to the business world. Accounting, negotiation, finance, marketing, international trade, are just some of the main topics to mention that this degree allows you to deep dive into. Upon graduating, every student will have the required tools and skills to follwo their own professional path.
In my experience it seems to me that the environment of study among classmates is good. The library is a good area of study but what needs to be controlled is the noise, because many times the classmates go to the library to talk and it is annoying. The variety of books is good, considering the size of the library and the attention also seems good.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
