Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo - UCB vs Universidad del Valle - UNIVALLE vs Universidad Mayor de San Andrés - UMSA vs Universidad de Aquino de Bolivia - UDABOL vs Oklahoma State University - OSU

Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Oklahoma State University - OSU (5.00)
Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo - UCB: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad del Valle - UNIVALLE: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Mayor de San Andrés - UMSA: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Aquino de Bolivia - UDABOL: wins 0/7 categories
Oklahoma State University - OSU: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad Privada Franz Tamayo - UNIFRANZ: wins 2/7 categories
Uganda Institute of Information and Communications Technology - UICT: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: BS Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Psychological Science
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Information Technology Management for Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.35
Not rated
3.21
Not rated
4.83
Win
3.00
4.50
Location
4.71
Win
Not rated
4.54
Not rated
3.83
4.00
4.50
Professors
4.00
Not rated
3.93
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
4.50
Internationality
3.06
Not rated
3.29
3.00
4.67
5.00
Win
4.50
Student life
4.31
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
4.50
Value
4.06
Not rated
4.21
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
3.50
Accommodation
4.12
Not rated
2.54
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Impressive campus facilities and infrastructure
  • +Excellent teaching staff with expertise and practical knowledge
  • +Strong reputation, prestige, and professional networking opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +High academic standards and quality teaching from experienced faculty.
  • +Practical training opportunities and sought-after, competitive professionals.
  • +Multidisciplinary knowledge acquisition and relevant industry connections.
  • +Effective teaching and progress support
  • +Reliable problem resolution
  • +Outstanding faculty and high-quality education
  • +Strong research facilities and opportunities
  • +Supportive student environment and friendly community
  • +Good facilities and dynamic classrooms
  • +Well-equipped, quiet campus environment
  • +Entertainment and social spaces
  • +Strong IT programs and resources
  • +Qualified and professional lecturers
  • +Flexibility in study periods
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.

Nothing to show

  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues are a common complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources significantly hinder the learning experience.
  • -A lack of clear communication and support from staff causes dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication is frequently unclear or lacking.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of practical experience and unclear career prospects.
  • -Lack of engagement and support from instructors.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Administrative & management issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a major drawback.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of engagement detract from learning.
Rating summary
What students say

Among the surveyed aspects, the university's location stands out as its strongest attribute with a score of 4.71. Facilities also received positive marks at 4.35. Conversely, internationality emerged as the lowest-rated area, scoring 3.06. Value for money was rated at 4.06, while accommodation, student life, and professors garnered respectable scores in the low to mid-four range.

Nothing to show

An analysis of university ratings reveals a strong performance in its **Location**, which received the highest score. The **Value** of education also stands out positively. However, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. Other aspects like **Professors**, **Student Life**, **Internationality**, and **Facilities** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally well-rounded institution with specific areas of excellence and concern.

Here's a summary of the university ratings:

**Performance is notably strong in the areas of professors (rated 4 out of 5) and internationality and value (both rated 3 out of 5). Conversely, the university receives zero ratings for its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, indicating significant weaknesses in these aspects.** This suggests a primary focus on academic quality and global engagement, with considerable room for improvement in the physical campus and student experience offerings.

Overall, this university garners impressive scores across various aspects. Its strongest areas are professors and value, both achieving a perfect rating of 5. Facilities and student life are also highly rated. The weakest area identified is location. Internationality and accommodation also received positive feedback.

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving a perfect score of 5. Its Location and Accommodation also stand out with strong ratings of 4. Facilities and Professors, however, received the lowest scores at 3, indicating these areas may have room for improvement. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in student experience and global engagement.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strength in several key areas, earning top marks for its facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality, all at an impressive 4.5. In contrast, accommodation and value received more moderate scores of 3 and 3.5 respectively, suggesting these are areas with room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~89% of reviews are highly positive. Students praise the university's impressive campus, great facilities, excellent teaching staff, and central location. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~79% of feedback being highly favorable. Students commend high academic standards, experienced faculty, and practical learning opportunities. No negative reviews were recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students appreciate the progress and teaching, including refresher courses. One student experienced a documentation issue causing a degree delay but a solution was provided.

All 6 reviews are positive, giving a 5/5 average rating. Students praise outstanding faculties, cutting-edge research, supportive learning environments, and a friendly, welcoming community. The location's small-city feel is mentioned as a minor point.

With an average rating of 4/5 and ~100% positive feedback, students praise good facilities and dynamic classrooms. The single negative review was brief.

With a 4/5 average rating, reviews are ~100% positive. Students highlight IT career prospects, state-of-the-art labs, flexible study, and qualified lecturers. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Rating distribution
5★
39%
0%
21%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
39%
0%
57%
100%
0%
100%
100%
3★
22%
0%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close