British Columbia Institute of Technology - BCIT vs University of British Columbia vs Lighthouse Labs vs Cornerstone International Community College of Canada vs Emily Carr University of Art and Design - ECUAD
Side-by-side comparison from 217 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on learning and projects
- +Industry-experienced instructors and real-world relevance
- +Strong career outcomes and job placement
- +Challenging academics and rewarding workload
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning opportunities
- +Vibrant campus, abundant resources, and supportive environment
Nothing to show
- +Engaging instructors and practical, real-world skills development
- +Supportive learning environment and personal growth opportunities
- +Focused, valuable programs with diverse, relevant subject matter
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and professional instructors and advisors
- +Creative teaching approach and personalized attention
- +Close-knit and supportive campus environment
- +Supportive and helpful teachers
- +Practical co-op experiences
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engagement and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Difficulty with course selection and academic support in large classes.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and arbitrary grading practices.
- -Challenges finding genuine connections and disappointing social scene outside of clubs.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Lack of administrative support and clear communication.
- -Ineffective or uninspired teaching and curriculum.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated and inadequate.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -Administrative issues and poor communication are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes seen as lacking.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its international student experience, reflected by a high rating for Internationality. The location also receives a favorable score. Areas for potential improvement include student life and facilities, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like professors, accommodation, and overall value are rated positively.
Evaluations reveal a university excelling in several key aspects. The location garners the highest score, followed closely by internationality and student life, indicating a vibrant and globally connected environment. Professors and value also receive positive, albeit slightly lower, ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Facilities, while solid, are not a standout feature compared to other categories.
Nothing to show
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its location stands out as a perfect score, while professors and overall value are also highly regarded. The weakest area, though still strong, is its facilities rating. Student life, internationality, and accommodation are all robustly rated, contributing to a generally excellent university experience.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a notably strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** are identified as the weakest areas, each scoring a 3. The university also received solid ratings for its **Professors** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4), with **Internationality** and **Value** falling in the mid-range.
Remarkably high scores characterize this institution, with exceptional ratings of 5 in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. These areas represent the university's strongest points. Conversely, the Accomodation rating of 3 indicates a relative weakness, while the Value score of 4 suggests a generally positive but not outstanding offering in that regard.
Nearly all (95%+) of student reviews are positive, praising hands-on learning, industry-experienced instructors, and strong career outcomes. No negative feedback was reported.
Over 86% of reviews praise demanding yet rewarding academics, great study spaces, and excellent resources. A small minority (~1%) mentions course selection difficulties and the struggle to connect with people.
Nothing to show
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.6/5. Students highlight practical learning, knowledgeable instructors, and a supportive environment. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
Nothing to show
With one positive review out of two, approximately 50% of feedback highlights a supportive campus environment and creative instructors. The average rating is 3.5/5, with no negative reviews.
The sole review is highly positive (5/5), praising the Applied Communications course for being helpful to responsible, self-driven students with clear goals. Teachers are noted as very supportive.
Nothing to show
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
