British Columbia Institute of Technology - BCIT vs University of British Columbia vs Fairleigh Dickinson University - FDU vs Lighthouse Labs vs Canadian Tourism College - CTC
Side-by-side comparison from 216 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, hands-on learning and projects
- +Industry-experienced instructors and real-world relevance
- +Strong career outcomes and job placement
- +Excellent professors and engaging courses
- +Valuable career preparation and practical learning opportunities
- +Abundant resources, study spaces, and campus support services
- +Exceptional faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +Strong career preparation and real-world opportunities
- +Positive atmosphere and supportive environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Experienced faculty and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and equipment
- +Commitment to diversity and inclusion
- +Engaging instructors and effective presentation skills development
- +Foundational knowledge in social media campaign planning
- +Desire for more practical, hands-on learning experiences
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of engagement and support from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Administrative & course selection issues are frustrating.
- -Social life can feel superficial and exclusive.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality, with some professors subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a significant concern.
- -The teaching quality and course content often fall short of expectations.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of clear communication
This institution demonstrates a strong performance in its international student experience, reflected by a high rating for Internationality. The location also receives a favorable score. Areas for potential improvement include student life and facilities, which received the lowest ratings among the surveyed categories. Other aspects like professors, accommodation, and overall value are rated positively.
This institution's surveyed areas reveal a mixed performance. The strongest aspects are Location, scoring 4.45, closely followed by Internationality at 4.35 and Student Life at 4.31. Facilities also received a commendable 4.22 rating. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.86, while Professors and Value fall within the mid-range.
This institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, notably Internationality and Value, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Location are also highly rated at 4.33. Student Life stands out as a comparatively weaker area, with a rating of 3.67. Accomodation also received a solid rating of 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution garners particularly strong ratings in **Internationality (5)**, indicating a well-developed global presence. **Facilities** and **Location** also score highly at 4. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, rated only 1.5. **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** all sit in the mid-range, with scores of 3.5, 3, and 3.5 respectively.
This institution showcases a mixed but generally positive performance according to the provided ratings. It excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving top marks of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as a significant weakness with a rating of 1. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality are rated moderately at 3, while Value is strong at 4.
Nearly all (95%+) of student reviews are positive, praising hands-on learning, industry-experienced instructors, and strong career outcomes. No negative feedback was reported.
With 4.23/5 stars from 191 reviews, approximately 74% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics, professors, and resources. Negative feedback, representing about 1.1%, mentions course selection difficulties and inconsistent professor quality.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.67/5, students highlight excellent faculty, effective teaching methods like case studies and teamwork, and strong connections between academics and career opportunities. The university's atmosphere and location are also praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 based on two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight experienced faculty and modern facilities as key strengths. No negative feedback was recorded.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), rating the program 4/5 stars. Students appreciated energetic instructors and found presentations helpful for public speaking and learning social media campaign planning fundamentals. Some noted a lack of job-readiness and need for more hands-on programs.
Nothing to show
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Pros Energetic instructors Gain the fundamental knowledge of social media campaign planning A LOT of presentations are helpful for public speaking Cons Not good enough to gain a job in marketing/social media Needs more hands-on programs or self-learning
