University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST vs Sudan University for Science and Technology vs Thames College vs University of Khartoum - UofK vs The National Ribat University - NRU

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Thames College (5.00)
University of Medical Sciences and Technology - UMST: wins 0/5 categories
Sudan University for Science and Technology: wins 0/5 categories
Thames College: wins 5/5 categories
University of Khartoum - UofK: wins 0/5 categories
The National Ribat University - NRU: wins 0/5 categories
Upper Nile University: wins 0/5 categories
Al Neelain University: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Medicine and Surgery
Best programme: Architecture
Kathmandu, Nepal
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: BBA International Business
Best programme: Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
2.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.44
2.67
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Professors
3.78
2.67
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Internationality
3.78
2.67
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Student life
3.56
3.33
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Value
3.89
3.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.63
2.00
4.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and practical learning experiences
  • +Supportive and inspiring campus environment
  • +Strong faculty and well-structured academic programs
  • +Engaging lectures and active student community
  • +Extensive social events and party scene
  • +Accessible educational support
  • +Well-rounded, real-world preparation
  • +Strong academic programs
  • +Academic and social growth opportunities
  • +Comprehensive and relevant course content
  • +Diverse and engaging community

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues make the university experience difficult and unresponsive to student needs.
  • -The course content and assessments lack depth and thoroughness, leaving students feeling unprepared.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Student support services are perceived as inadequate and unresponsive.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unsupportive instructors are prevalent complaints.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates strong performance in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** emerged as the weakest area, scoring lowest among the evaluated aspects. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value received solid, mid-range scores, indicating a generally well-rounded experience with a standout location. Accommodations also scored reasonably well.

This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.

This institution achieves outstanding scores in several key areas, notably in its facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality, all receiving a perfect five. Accommodations present a slight dip with a score of four, indicating this is the relatively weakest aspect. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strength and value, as reflected in the consistent high ratings across most metrics.

This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. It excels significantly in Student Life, achieving a perfect score. Conversely, Location and Internationality are identified as its weakest aspects, both receiving low marks. Other categories like Facilities and Accommodation are rated moderately, while Professors and Value are strong points.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic excellence, practical learning, and a supportive environment. ~22% of feedback mentions issues with unfocused courses and administrative challenges.

With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.

With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight a well-rounded education preparing students for real-world challenges. No negative comments were recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives largely positive feedback. Students highlight academic growth, diverse course offerings, and a rich social experience within a diverse community. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
56%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
22%
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
67%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
2★
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close