Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI vs Universidad Anáhuac vs CINVESTAV vs Universidad Panamericana vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 52 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI (5.00)
Universidad Nacional de Ingenieria - UNI: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 3/5 categories
CINVESTAV: wins 0/5 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 0/5 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/5 categories
Siantou University Institute: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Communication
Zacatenco, Mexico
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.50
Location
5.00
4.50
Not rated
4.25
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Professors
4.50
4.41
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
3.00
4.50
Internationality
3.50
4.59
Win
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.00
4.63
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.50
Value
4.50
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Accommodation
4.00
4.66
Win
Not rated
3.75
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic rigor and critical thinking development
  • +Supportive community and positive campus environment
  • +Quality infrastructure and experienced faculty
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Highly engaging and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
  • +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.

Nothing to show

  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues prevent timely issuance of crucial documents.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a robust offering, with its **Location** standing out as its strongest asset, earning a perfect score. Professors are also highly regarded, receiving a strong 4.5. Conversely, **Internationality** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, at 3.5. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and value all received solid marks in the 4-4.5 range.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

Nothing to show

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its teaching staff, earning a high rating for professors. Conversely, its physical infrastructure presents the most significant area for improvement, as indicated by the lowest score for facilities. The university also scores moderately well in student life and value, suggesting a decent overall experience, with location, accommodation, and internationality falling in the middle ground.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a high academic level, strong foundational knowledge, and a positive university experience with good facilities and a supportive environment.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With an average rating of 2.5/5, feedback is mixed. Approximately 50% of reviews are negative, citing issues with administrative processes and degree certification delays. No positive reviews were recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
67%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
4★
0%
39%
0%
58%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
1★
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close