Tamkang University vs Wheaton College vs MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM vs Mangrove Institute of Science and Technology - MIST vs Visayan Maritime Academy - VMA-GC

Side-by-side comparison from 11 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Tamkang University: wins 0/5 categories
Wheaton College: wins 1/5 categories
MIM Kyiv Business School - MIM: wins 3/5 categories
Mangrove Institute of Science and Technology - MIST: wins 0/5 categories
Visayan Maritime Academy - VMA-GC: wins 0/5 categories
Federal University of Goias - UFG: wins 0/5 categories
American University Kyiv - AUK: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Wheaton, Illinois, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Elementary Education
Best programme: MBA
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Software Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
2.00
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
4.00
Location
4.00
4.67
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Professors
2.50
5.00
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Internationality
2.50
4.33
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
1.00
Student life
2.50
4.67
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Value
2.00
5.00
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.00
4.33
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
1.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive academic environment and flexible learning.
  • +Opportunities for active participation and idea exchange.
  • +Engaging and challenging academics with invested professors
  • +Supportive community and strong student relationships
  • +Valuable life experiences and proximity to a major city
  • +Comprehensive business understanding and accessible teaching
  • +Experiential learning, mentorship, and community events
  • +Real-world application and career preparation

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Unique international internship and project opportunities
  • +Welcoming and supportive campus atmosphere
Cons
  • -Inadequate teacher training and class management.
  • -Lack of diverse student body hindering learning.
  • -Inefficient use of class time with unproductive activities.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance plague the campus.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of practical experience and outdated curriculum hinder career readiness.
  • -Poor administrative support and unclear communication are frequent complaints.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are significant drawbacks.
  • -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or lacking practical application.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are consistently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates significant strengths in its **location**, receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, the institution faces considerable challenges in its **facilities** and **accommodation**, both scoring a low 2. Other areas, including **professors**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**, fall within a moderate range, averaging 2.5.

This institution receives excellent marks, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Value**, both awarded a perfect 5. Areas like **Location** and **Student Life** also score very highly, demonstrating strong student satisfaction. While **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are rated slightly lower, they still maintain a solid score of 4.33, indicating a generally positive experience across the board.

This institution receives high marks across most categories, with Facilities standing out as its strongest area at a perfect 5. Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are also exceptionally strong, each scoring 4.67. Professors represent the weakest area, though still solid at 4.33, with Location also performing well at 4.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution receives top marks for its **location** and **value**, both scoring a perfect 5. **Facilities**, **professors**, and **student life** are also well-regarded, each earning a solid 4. However, areas requiring significant improvement are **accommodation** and **internationality**, with scores of 1 and 1.5 respectively, indicating these are the university's weakest points.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Two out of three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 3/5. Positive feedback highlights flexibility and opportunities for discussion. One negative review, representing about 33.3% of feedback, points to inexperienced teachers and a lack of diverse classmates.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Recurring themes include supportive professors who invest in students, rigorous academics, a strong sense of community, and the benefit of being located near a major city.

Students highly praise the comprehensive curriculum and excellent teaching staff, finding instruction accessible and engaging. Experiential learning opportunities and supportive faculty are frequently highlighted. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 5/5, students highlight unique opportunities like paid internships and international projects. The welcoming campus atmosphere is also frequently praised.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
67%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
67%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close