Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM vs Poznan University of Technology - PUT vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs WSB University - WSB vs Poznan University of Economics and Business - UEP
Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Beautiful, well-maintained campus with nature
- +Vibrant and inclusive student community
- +Practical, industry-connected programs with research opportunities
- +Strong international focus and English-taught courses
- +Modern facilities and helpful administrative support
- +Dedicated and inspiring professors
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Opportunities for growth and diverse experiences
- +Supportive teachers and staff with good communication
- +Practical, real-world focused learning and career preparation
- +Flexible study formats, including hybrid and online options
- +Practical and theoretical education with understanding professors
- +Affordable city and housing options with many student opportunities
- +Extensive development and international study programs
- +Approachable and knowledgeable professors
- +Supportive administration and easy-to-use systems
- +Practical, job-market-focused curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Disappointing lack of practical application and insufficient learning from classes.
- -Poor program coordination due to unengaged or inexperienced faculty.
- -Inconsistent class schedules with frequent cancellations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including misleading information and poor course coordination.
- -Inconsistent and disorganized teaching, with repeated content and last-minute class cancellations.
- -Lack of proper avenues for feedback or complaint resolution.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are major drawbacks.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive staff create a negative learning environment.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Many students report outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized.
- -Minimal learning and effort required for passing.
Nothing to show
Considering the provided metrics, the university excels particularly in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the lowest score, suggesting potential room for improvement. **Accomodation** and **Value** fall in the mid-range, while **Professors** also receive a solid rating.
Generally positive feedback marks this university's performance, with facilities emerging as the strongest area, scoring a notable 4.44. Professors also received high marks at 4.39. On the other hand, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, receiving a 3.78. Student life and internationality are rated at a respectable 4.06, while location and value fall within the mid-range of the provided scores.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas. Professors and facilities are particularly well-regarded, alongside a strong showing for internationality. Student life and accommodation represent the lowest-rated aspects, although these still fall within a generally positive range. Location and value also receive solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
This university demonstrates particular strengths in its **location**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores well for **internationality**. Conversely, **student life** and **accommodation** are identified as areas with the lowest scores. Facilities and professors both received solid, mid-range ratings.
This institution receives particularly strong commendations for its **location**, earning the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded. Areas that received lower scores include **student life** and **internationality**, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects. Other categories like facilities, accommodation, and value fall within a solid, positive range, suggesting a generally well-rounded university experience.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Facilities** standing out as a particular strength, receiving a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Professors** also score highly. Conversely, **Accommodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Student life, internationality, and value for money are all rated solidly.
Nothing to show
~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, a beautiful campus, and strong academic content. A small fraction of feedback (~4%) mentions disappointment with course practicality and occasional class cancellations.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 20 reviews, students highly praise the university. Recurring themes include strong engineering programs, industry connections, and excellent labs and faculty. No negative feedback was reported.
Approximately 92.5% of reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers, inspiring programs, and good organization. A small percentage (~7.5%) of negative feedback highlights issues with program structure and administrative concerns.
With an average rating of 4.08/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent teachers, good staff communication, practical learning, and opportunities for personal development. No negative reviews were submitted.
With an average rating of 4.45/5 from 11 reviews, approximately 91% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent professors, good class organization, and many development opportunities like Erasmus programs.
Most reviews praise helpful, knowledgeable teachers and a positive atmosphere. Students appreciate practical learning and an international environment. A small portion of feedback suggests the academic bar is low.
Nothing to show
In my opinion, Adam Mickiewicz University is a very solid institution, especially if you are interested in humanities, social sciences, or academic research. It has a good reputation, strong research facilities, and international connections, which provide significant opportunities for academic development. As for the drawbacks — the biggest challenges may be bureaucracy and administrative procedures, as well as the cost of accommodation, especially for international students. Therefore, it is worth carefully analyzing the faculties, the programme, and the housing options before starting your studies.
Nothing to show
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
Nothing to show
Choosing this university was the best decision in my life. Poznań University of Economics and Business provides lots of opportunities to students. It allows students to go abroad to almost any country in the world. I have attented Erasmus at University of West London. I can honestly say that in my opinion PUEB is on very high level and take care of its students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
