United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Hamilton College vs Escuela Normal de Torreón - ENT vs Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT vs ISG International Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 0/2 categories
Hamilton College: wins 0/2 categories
Escuela Normal de Torreón - ENT: wins 0/2 categories
Chengdu University of Technology - CDUT: wins 0/2 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 0/2 categories
Osaka University: wins 0/2 categories
Kansai University - KU: wins 2/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Clinton, Mississippi, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
4.50
5.00
Professors
4.75
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
3.50
5.00
Win
Student life
4.25
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.25
5.00
5.00
Value
4.50
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.25
5.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Beautiful campus and welcoming community
  • +Supportive and helpful professors
  • +Excellent academic challenge
  • +Excellent infrastructure and facilities.
  • +Well-prepared teachers.
  • +Good teacher training programs.

Nothing to show

  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
  • +Welcoming academic atmosphere and helpful staff
  • +Affordable and tasty food options
  • +Vibrant, traditional university environment
  • +Wide range of academic studies and research
  • +Active pursuit of sports
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement from staff.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
  • -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support cause dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
  • -Lack of support and guidance from instructors is a significant problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

Overall, this institution garners excellent marks across most aspects. The university excels with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, indicating outstanding offerings in these areas. Its weakest points, though still strong, are Internationality and Value, each receiving a rating of 4, suggesting room for minor improvement in global engagement and perceived worth.

Based on the provided ratings, the university demonstrates an equal distribution of performance across all evaluated aspects. No specific areas stand out as either particularly strong or weak, as each category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, received a neutral rating of zero. This suggests a consistent, albeit unremarkable, experience across the board.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

This institution garners excellent feedback, with perfect scores awarded for its facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation. Its location also receives strong marks. The weakest area identified is internationality, scoring 3.5, suggesting room for growth in global engagement. Overall, the university offers significant value, indicated by its solid rating of 4.

Remarkable strengths are evident in several key areas, with top marks awarded for Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Conversely, Facilities received the lowest rating, indicating this as a clear area for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

With a 4/5 average rating from 1 review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students praise the beautiful campus and supportive professors and staff.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 100% of feedback being favorable. Students highlighted excellent infrastructure and well-equipped facilities.

Nothing to show

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4 out of 5, approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting an excellent academic environment with friendly staff and affordable, delicious food. There is no negative feedback recorded.

Based on one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students praise its vibrant campus, diverse academic and research opportunities, and active sports scene.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
0%
100%
0%
50%
50%
100%
4★
0%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
3★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Master’s degree

Excellent academic environment. Friendly lab mates and professors. Food service is inexpensive and delicious. The only thing I dislike was the extreme humid and hot summer days. Other than that, everything is excellent.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close