London School of Commerce - LSC vs The University of Asia Pacific vs Birshreshtha Noor Mohammad Public College - BNMPC vs Bangladesh University vs Atish Dipankar University of Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/2 categories
The University of Asia Pacific: wins 0/2 categories
Birshreshtha Noor Mohammad Public College - BNMPC: wins 2/2 categories
Bangladesh University: wins 0/2 categories
Atish Dipankar University of Science and Technology: wins 0/2 categories
Central University of Science and Technology: wins 0/2 categories
City University: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Science
Dhaka, Bangladesh
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: BSc Pharmacy
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
5.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
5.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.75
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-designed and engaging curriculum
  • +Positive and meaningful overall experience
  • +Supportive teachers and academic discipline
  • +Focus on conceptual understanding and exam prep
  • +Valuable co-curricular opportunities
  • +Cooperative and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Supportive administration and academic environment
  • +Practical and theoretical course design
  • +Structured curriculum and foundational knowledge
  • +Supportive faculty and guidance
  • +Personal and academic growth opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary equipment frustrate students.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching quality leads to a poor learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a consistently positive experience. The university's **Value** also receives a respectable score of 4, rounding out its generally strong performance.

With universal top marks, this institution excels across every surveyed facet. Its strengths are evident in its outstanding facilities, faculty, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value, all receiving perfect scores. No areas present as weak relative to these exceptional ratings.

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating a highly supportive and engaging environment. Professors and internationality are also strong points, both rated a solid 4. The university demonstrates good value for students, also earning a 4. The weakest area, relative to its excellent performance elsewhere, is the professor rating.

Across all assessed categories, this institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent and high level of quality. Its strengths are evident in uniformly excellent ratings for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, each scoring a solid 4 out of 5. No single area stands out as significantly weaker than the others, indicating a well-rounded and satisfactory experience for its students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights a positive and meaningful experience. This feedback emphasizes a well-planned program and experienced, supportive faculty.

The sole review is a positive 5/5 rating. It highlights a well-structured, disciplined academic environment, supportive teachers, and valuable co-curricular opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.

With one review at 4/5 stars, the feedback is highly positive, highlighting a good academic environment with cooperative faculty and supportive administration. No negative feedback was received.

The two reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a meaningful academic journey, strong theoretical foundations in core pharmacy subjects, and supportive faculty.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close