Utrecht University - UU vs Universidade Metropolitana de Santos - UNIMES vs University of Zenica - UNZE vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs Kemmy Business School - KBS

Side-by-side comparison from 93 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore - UET (4.60)
Utrecht University - UU: wins 1/7 categories
Universidade Metropolitana de Santos - UNIMES: wins 0/7 categories
University of Zenica - UNZE: wins 5/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
Kemmy Business School - KBS: wins 0/7 categories
University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore - UET: wins 1/7 categories
Bandarban University: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Utrecht, The Netherlands
4.10
Read more reviews
60 reviews
×
Best programme: Biochemistry
Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Physical Education
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Bandarban, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
Win
Not rated
3.00
3.25
4.00
4.07
Not rated
Location
4.28
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.75
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Professors
4.03
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.25
4.00
4.30
Not rated
Internationality
4.24
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.50
4.00
4.15
Not rated
Student life
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.75
4.00
4.44
Not rated
Value
4.20
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.75
4.00
4.52
Not rated
Accommodation
3.75
Not rated
4.00
2.00
4.00
4.15
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High quality education and independent thinking encouragement
  • +Broad course selection and academic freedom
  • +Insightful and practical courses useful for future careers

Nothing to show

  • +Calm, focused learning environment
  • +Practical, industry-experienced faculty
  • +Organized, medium-sized campus
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Expert faculty and supportive environment
  • +Modern facilities and accommodation
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Practical and foundational curriculum
  • +Encouraging and collaborative learning environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues are a major concern.
  • -Lack of teacher and supervisor support negatively impacts the learning experience.
  • -The environment is perceived as stressful and lacking in positive support.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not well-taught.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication and transparency are lacking from leadership.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a common complaint.
  • -The administration and management are often criticized for their inefficiency and lack of support.
  • -A curriculum that is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered leads to student dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Student feedback reveals a generally strong university experience. Location and Student Life stand out as the highest-rated aspects, both exceeding 4.25. Internationality and Value also received excellent scores, around 4.2. Facilities and Professors are rated well, though slightly lower than the top areas. Accomodation is the weakest point, scoring significantly lower than other categories.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a compelling profile, excelling in key areas such as professors, location, student life, internationality, and value, all receiving perfect scores. Its facilities, while still strong, are rated the lowest at a respectable 3. Accommodation also scores highly at a 4. Overall, the university offers a well-rounded and highly desirable experience.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a consistent and strong performance. Each aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and internationality, has earned a rating of 4. The university excels uniformly, with no single area standing out significantly above others, nor any area identified as a weakness. Its balanced approach suggests a well-rounded educational experience.

Analysis of the university's ratings reveals a generally positive student experience. Student life stands out as the strongest area, achieving the highest score. Conversely, facilities are rated lowest, though still a respectable 4.07. Other categories, including professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value, all received favorable scores, indicating a well-rounded university environment.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 98.3% of feedback is positive, highlighting high-quality education, independent thinking, and freedom in course selection. A small portion of feedback mentions disorganization and lack of guidance.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the university is perceived positively. It offers a calm and focused learning environment, particularly for engineering and technical fields, with a practical, industry-focused approach.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews praise the vibrant academic community, state-of-the-art amenities, and expert faculty. ~100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews recorded.

With a 4.59 average rating from 27 reviews, ~96% of feedback is positive. Students praise supportive faculty, practical curriculum, and excellent skill-building opportunities. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
18%
0%
0%
50%
0%
63%
0%
4★
72%
0%
100%
25%
100%
33%
0%
3★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Eco friendly zone for learning.

Utrecht University strikes the ideal balance between top-tier academics and an amazing student experience. As a science major, I love how challenging and research-focused the program is—it really pushes me to think deeper. The Utrecht Science Park campus is super modern, sustainable, and just a great place to study. What really makes UU special is its international vibe. Working with classmates from all over the world brought fresh perspectives to every project. The libraries are fantastic (I lived in both the silent study zones and the lively café areas!), and a cool bonus is the free Dutch classes for international students—they seriously helped me feel at home. Utrecht itself is the perfect student city: historic canals, fun events, and just the right mix of energy and coziness. Sure, there’s some paperwork headaches sometimes, but overall, UU gave me everything I needed to grow—both academically and as a global citizen.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close