University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Cracow University of Technology - PK vs Gdansk University of Technology vs University of Lodz - UL vs University of Economics and Innovation in Lublin - WSEI
Side-by-side comparison from 222 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and excellent professors
- +Valuable practical experience and research opportunities
- +Enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +Practical and up-to-date courses with opportunities for hands-on learning
- +Passionate and helpful professors with real-world experience
- +Friendly environment fostering personal and academic growth
- +Strong academic programmes and helpful professors
- +Positive environment and friendly people
- +Good career prospects and university reputation
- +High-quality education with excellent, approachable professors and a supportive atmosphere.
- +Diverse, international, and social environment with many opportunities.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a positive urban setting.
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers and staff
- +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world application
- +Welcoming and friendly university environment
- +Diverse international atmosphere and cultural exchange
- +Strong personal and academic growth opportunities
- +Supportive and efficient teaching staff
- +Supportive teaching staff
- +Positive overall experience
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are a significant issue.
- -Course content is often irrelevant for students with a relevant BA.
- -Program lacks promised opportunities beyond specific career paths.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and delivery are often seen as uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Outdated courses and unprepared or arrogant instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues impacting the student experience.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of efficient management.
- -Outdated or poorly maintained facilities and resources.
- -Unengaging curriculum and ineffective teaching methods.
- -administrative & management issues
- -outdated facilities
- -lack of clear communication
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of clear guidance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus upkeep are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of clear communication and limited support services are also significant concerns.
This university garners strong feedback across several key areas. The location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving a score of 4.8. Professors also received excellent marks, with a rating of 4.45. Accommodation represents the lowest score among the surveyed categories at 4.01. Overall, student life, facilities, and internationality also received favorable ratings between 4.1 and 4.2.
This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly Internationality and Value, both scoring a high 4.31. Facilities and Student Life are also very strong, averaging 4.27. Professors and Location are well-regarded at 4.06 and 4.17 respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is Accomodation at a 4.0 rating.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in location, with a rating of 4.67, and student life, at 4.47. Facilities and professors also received solid scores of 4.06. Accommodations are rated highly at 4.3, while internationality stands at 4.17. Value for money is also positive at 4.2. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile, with its geographical setting and campus experience being particularly notable.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Location and value are particularly well-regarded, achieving scores over 4.2. Internationality and professors also score highly, exceeding 4.1. While student life and accommodation are rated positively, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories.
This university garners impressive scores in several key areas, with **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.67 and **Facilities** also highly rated at 4.57. **Student Life** and **Professors** also received positive marks. However, **Accomodation** presents a significant challenge, with a considerably lower rating of 2.83, indicating this is the weakest aspect according to the provided data. **Internationality** and **Value** fall within a solid middle range.
This institution receives exceptional acclaim for its vibrant student life, robust internationality, and strong value proposition. Facilities, professors, and location also score highly, indicating a well-rounded experience. The weakest area is accommodation, which received a significantly lower rating. Overall, the university offers a positive environment with a few opportunities for improvement.
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, with excellent scores for Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Value is also a standout area, achieving a perfect 5. Conversely, Accommodations represent a significant weakness, earning a score of 0. Internationality also lags behind other metrics, with a rating of 2.
With a 4.37/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, engaged professors, practical opportunities, and the city. A small percentage (~4%) mention disappointment with specific course content and limited opportunities in some programs.
With 14 out of 17 reviews being positive (~82%), students praise practical, up-to-date courses and a friendly, supportive environment. Professors and staff are described as helpful and passionate.
With a 3.87 average rating from 15 reviews, about 74% are positive, highlighting friendly people, good programs, and a nice environment. A small portion, ~7%, mentioned some outdated courses and unhelpful teachers.
With a 4.13/5 average rating from 98 reviews, ~94% are positive, highlighting a high-quality education, supportive academic staff, and a social, dynamic city. No negative feedback was received.
Students largely praise the university's welcoming environment and approachable, supportive lecturers, with a strong emphasis on practical application. Minor feedback suggests potential areas for improvement in sports facilities and clarification of explanations.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, averaging 4.75/5 stars. Students praise the cultural blend, welcoming atmosphere, efficient teachers, and opportunities for personal and academic growth.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback is predominantly positive, highlighting supportive teaching staff. There is no negative feedback to report.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
Nothing to show
After 2 academic years at GUT, I can say with confidence that I have really enjoyed my time in here! Starting from classes/lectures and integration events to the location of the University, I have been satisfied mostly about everything. I could see that GUT had a very high reputation in terms of labor market for businesses, where representatives of companies and big corporations come to look for new candidates for their organizations by organising job fairs, lectures etc. For example, I had a chance to take part in such a lecture arranged by State Street Bank representatives and passed tests organised later on. As a result, several students and I were granted a summer internship, after which most of us including me continued working there. So, in terms of finding a job while still being a student GUT is highly recommended as most of the professors are flexible when it comes to attendance. Additionally, you can easily integrate by joining Erasmus ;) they always have something planned like party, meetings, games, trips etc. I have met many interesting people/brains/personalities/characters and made many friends. So, I have no regrets at all choosing GUT as a university for my Master's degree! I would make the same choice if I had to choose again ;)
I was an international student at the University of Lodz in Poland. I am very happy that I choose this university for my masters studies. May be for some one its not but the overall discipline is appreciable.
WSEI is a really friendly place to be, the staff are approachable and helpful. My unique experiences were learning about how to care for the sick in ways that I never knew existed such as making the patients feel comfortable and treating them like family since I am studying nursing. It made me feel more passionate and look forward to all my lectures.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
