United International Business Schools - UIBS vs ISG International Business School vs Nova Scotia College of Art and Design University - NSCAD U vs Houdegbe North American University of Benin vs University of Richmond

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 1/4 categories
ISG International Business School: wins 1/4 categories
Nova Scotia College of Art and Design University - NSCAD U: wins 0/4 categories
Houdegbe North American University of Benin: wins 1/4 categories
University of Richmond: wins 0/4 categories
WSB Merito Universities: wins 1/4 categories
Kumamoto University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: International Relations and Global Affairs
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: 3D Design
Best programme: Electrical Engineering and Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
1.00
3.00
Not rated
4.57
Win
3.00
Location
4.75
4.50
5.00
4.00
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Professors
4.75
4.50
5.00
4.00
Not rated
4.29
5.00
Internationality
4.50
4.75
Win
1.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Student life
4.25
4.25
1.00
4.00
Not rated
4.14
4.00
Value
4.50
4.00
2.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.14
4.00
Accommodation
4.00
Win
3.25
1.00
2.00
Not rated
3.67
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
  • +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
  • +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +English-taught programs and international focus
  • +Convenient location near amenities and the beach

Nothing to show

  • +Approachable and knowledgeable professors
  • +Supportive administration and easy-to-use systems
  • +Practical, job-market-focused curriculum
  • +Practical skills & relevant coursework
  • +Diverse and expert faculty
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and poor communication lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Minimal learning and effort required for passing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university presents a commendable profile with significant strengths, particularly in its **value**, where it achieved a perfect score. **Professors**, **location**, and **student life** are also rated highly. The university's weakest area is **accommodation**, receiving a score of 2. **Facilities** and **internationality** fall into the mid-range with scores of 3.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners positive feedback, with its **Facilities** standing out as a particular strength, receiving a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Professors** also score highly. Conversely, **Accommodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Student life, internationality, and value for money are all rated solidly.

Performance across surveyed categories reveals a mixed yet generally positive university profile. The institution excels significantly in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are identified as the weakest areas, each scoring a moderate 3 out of 5. Student life and internationality both garnered solid ratings, suggesting good engagement and a diverse campus environment, with value also being well-received.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise its completely English-taught programs and desirable location near the beach.

Nothing to show

Most reviews praise helpful, knowledgeable teachers and a positive atmosphere. Students appreciate practical learning and an international environment. A small portion of feedback suggests the academic bar is low.

The single review is positive, rating 4 out of 5 stars. It highlights learning practical skills in electrical circuits and information systems, aiding job prospects. Professors' diverse expertise was also praised.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
50%
0%
0%
0%
57%
0%
4★
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
29%
100%
3★
25%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close