United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Ozyegin University vs ISG International Business School vs William Angliss Institute - WAI vs University of Venda - Univen
Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty
- +Positive and enriching learning experience
- +Safe and well-equipped campus
- +Rapid development and global competitiveness
- +Social and personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive international community
- +International & multicultural environment, supportive atmosphere
- +Dynamic professors, engaging and flexible programs
- +Excellent alumni network, international opportunities
- +Hands-on learning & accommodating staff
- +Large campus
- +Limited post-graduation options
- +Professional and supportive lecturers
- +Clean and secure campus environment
- +Opportunities for learning and student interaction
- +Accessible and engaging online learning with supportive instructors.
- +Concise lectures and expert guidance foster knowledge development.
- +Well-designed programs that challenge and reward students.
- +Practical skills & relevant coursework
- +Diverse and expert faculty
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Lack of English instruction and communication barriers with staff and students.
- -Unwillingness of Turkish students to communicate with international students.
- -Discriminatory environment for international students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of resources and support hampers academic success.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of basic amenities are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder academic progress.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a major concern.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues create frustration.
- -A lack of practical and relevant course content is disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to confusion.
Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.
This institution excels in its facilities, receiving a high rating of 4.5. Accommodation is also a strong point, scoring a respectable 4. However, areas requiring attention include location and internationality, both rated below 3. Student life and value fall in the mid-range, with professors also receiving a moderate score.
This university demonstrates excellent strengths in **Internationality**, with a score of 4.75, and **Professors**, rated at 4.5. **Location** also receives a high mark of 4.5. While **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Value** are all well-regarded, the **Accomodation** is its weakest point, receiving a score of 3.25.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly for its professors, who received a perfect score. Facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality all scored a solid 4 out of 5, indicating a well-rounded university experience. The weakest area appears to be value, which scored a 3, suggesting a slight concern in this regard compared to other aspects.
This institution receives commendations for its professors and value, with both scoring above 4.0. Conversely, facilities and accommodation ratings are the lowest among the surveyed aspects. Student life, internationality, and location also fall within a similar moderate range.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its Facilities, Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value. Conversely, it receives zero ratings for Location and Accommodation, indicating these aspects may require significant improvement or are not provided by the university.
Performance across surveyed categories reveals a mixed yet generally positive university profile. The institution excels significantly in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are identified as the weakest areas, each scoring a moderate 3 out of 5. Student life and internationality both garnered solid ratings, suggesting good engagement and a diverse campus environment, with value also being well-received.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.
With a 3.43 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting rapid development and global competitiveness. However, ~28.6% express dissatisfaction, citing issues with English instruction and student interaction for internationals.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the international environment, knowledgeable professors, and encouragement of entrepreneurial thinking. No negative feedback was received.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, this university is positively received. The single review highlighted enjoyable hands-on course content and a large campus with accommodating staff.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 24 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Recurring themes highlight clean campuses, professional teachers, and abundant learning courses.
With an average rating of 5/5 and ~100% positive feedback, students praise the convenient and challenging online curriculum. They highlight concise lectures, clear instructions, and supportive instructors promoting skill development and knowledge progression.
The single review is positive, rating 4 out of 5 stars. It highlights learning practical skills in electrical circuits and information systems, aiding job prospects. Professors' diverse expertise was also praised.
Nothing to show
Özyeğin University offers excellent academic quality — the courses are well-structured and really do shape you into an educated person. The campus itself is beautiful, but somewhat isolated. However, for the tuition fees paid, you would expect better support and flexibility in services provided. Unfortunately, over time many of these services became more limited and less accessible, which has added unnecessary stress to the student experience. One of the biggest disappointments for me as a foreign student was the language barrier in supposedly English-taught programs. It is frustrating and discouraging to attend a class where the professor and majority of the students default to Turkish — leaving you at a clear disadvantage and often missing important details. This completely undermines the concept of an international program. On top of that, the university frequently changes its rules in ways that complicate students' situations year after year, making it harder to plan your academic path. Interacting with the administrative staff can also be very difficult and frustrating. While campus life is active and the university organizes many events, they are mostly conducted in Turkish, which further limits participation for foreign students. I was also surprised at the lack of fluency in English among professors, students, and staff — which makes you question how a local and an international student are expected to compete on the same level when the learning experience is not equal. In short, while the education is excellent, the university is not as international or inclusive as it promotes itself to be, and foreign students should be aware of these challenges before enrolling.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
