Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs University College Lahore vs Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs National College of Business Administration and Economics vs Lahore Leads University

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 0/4 categories
University College Lahore: wins 0/4 categories
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 0/4 categories
National College of Business Administration and Economics: wins 0/4 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/4 categories
University of Child Health Sciences, Lahore: wins 4/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.00
3.00
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
Location
4.00
3.50
2.50
3.67
3.00
5.00
Win
Professors
5.00
5.00
4.00
3.67
4.00
5.00
Internationality
4.00
4.50
5.00
2.67
1.00
5.00
Student life
5.00
3.50
5.00
3.00
3.00
5.00
Value
4.50
4.50
4.00
3.33
4.00
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.00
2.67
3.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Quality education and diverse programmes
  • +Supportive environment and extracurriculars
  • +Adequate resources for specific fields
  • +Excellent reputation and program variety
  • +Strong accounting, law, engineering, and computer science offerings
  • +Expert faculty & outcome-based education
  • +Engaging professors & strong class participation
  • +Cooperative administration & good infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive teachers and practical education
  • +Personal and professional development
  • +Nurturing and caring environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor student-teacher communication and lack of career counseling.
  • -Limited co-curricular activities and a general lack of student engagement opportunities.
  • -Unhelpful faculty members, with very few exceptions.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and a lack of practical application are major complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

Performance across various university aspects reveals a strong academic focus, with professors receiving the highest rating of 5. Facilities and accommodation are well-regarded, both scoring 4, complemented by an excellent internationality score of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a rating of 4.5. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are location and student life, each rated at 3.5.

This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a perfect 5. Professors also received strong marks with a 4. Conversely, the location is identified as a weaker area, receiving a 2.5. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately at 3, while value for money is also a positive aspect with a 4.

This university shows a mixed performance in its ratings. Its strongest areas are Professors and Location, both scoring an average of 3.67. Conversely, Accomodation and Internationality are its weakest points, each receiving a score of 2.67. Facilities and Student Life also averaged a moderate 3, while Value sits slightly above average at 3.33.

Nothing to show

This institution garners perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a flawless 5 out of 5. This indicates a consistently strong and highly desirable university experience, with no single area standing out as a particular weakness or strength relative to others.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the university is highly praised. Reviews highlight quality education, diverse degree options, and various extracurricular activities. Engineering students specifically note adequate lab equipment and qualified faculty.

The sole review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It praises the university as one of the best in Pakistan, highlighting its diverse program offerings in fields like accounting, law, engineering, and computer science.

Around 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting good faculty, infrastructure, and an engaging learning environment. Approximately 33% of feedback mentioned unhelpful faculty and a lack of career counseling and co-curricular activities.

Nothing to show

The sole review is highly positive, with a 5/5 rating, praising the quality of education and practical work. The reviewer highlighted effective teaching and personal development support.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
50%
100%
33%
0%
100%
4★
0%
50%
0%
33%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close