BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs UWS School of Business and Enterprise vs South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs AMA Computer University
Side-by-side comparison from 15 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
Nothing to show
- +Practical and affordable business and IT programs
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
- +International environment and cultural exchange
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Strong IT and tech programs.
- +Focus on technology and innovation.
- +Producing successful IT, engineering, and business graduates.
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
- +Balanced theory and lab work focus
- +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and unclear communication.
- -Poorly maintained and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of updated curriculum and teaching methods.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
Nothing to show
Remarkably, this institution shines with perfect scores in Internationality and Value, indicating a highly global and cost-effective experience. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Student Life also receive excellent ratings, demonstrating a well-rounded positive environment. The sole area with a slightly lower, though still good, rating is Accomodation at 4, suggesting it is the least exceptional aspect of the university.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution demonstrates a clear strength in its **Value** offerings, receiving a perfect score. Its academic environment is also highly regarded, with strong ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality**. Conversely, the university received no points for **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation**, indicating these are areas needing significant improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
Nothing to show
All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the practical, business and IT-focused programs, helpful faculty, and international environment. There were no negative reviews.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With a single review, this university boasts a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights strong IT and tech programs, a key strength. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
