BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Washington - UW vs Palacký University Olomouc - UPOL vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Sudan University for Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 74 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 3/7 categories
University of Washington - UW: wins 1/7 categories
Palacký University Olomouc - UPOL: wins 0/7 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 1/7 categories
Sudan University for Science and Technology: wins 0/7 categories
University of Antananarivo: wins 0/7 categories
Østfold University College: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Seattle, Washington, United States
4.20
Read more reviews
57 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: Anthropology
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Architecture
Antananarivo, Madagascar
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Control Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.59
4.20
4.71
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
Win
4.62
4.60
4.14
2.67
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.25
4.00
4.43
Win
2.67
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.40
3.80
4.43
2.67
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.00
4.38
4.40
4.29
3.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.00
4.32
Win
4.00
4.14
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
2.00
4.22
4.50
4.71
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong industry connections and practical business education
  • +International environment and balanced daily life
  • +Excellent and varied food options
  • +Inspiring professors and academic excellence
  • +Opportunities for research and real-world application
  • +Motivating campus environment and personal growth
  • +Diverse international environment and motivating education.
  • +Practical curriculum with knowledgeable and helpful professors.
  • +Hands-on learning opportunities and vibrant campus life.
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Engaging lectures and active student community
  • +Extensive social events and party scene
  • +Accessible educational support

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
  • +Balanced theory and lab work focus
  • +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
  • -Limited major availability and competitive admission processes are frustrating.
  • -There are issues with administrative processes and management.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and the overall experience.
  • -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts student success.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.

This university garners exceptional scores across the board. The standout areas are **Location** (4.62) and **Facilities** (4.59), indicating a highly desirable and well-equipped environment. **Student Life** (4.38) and **Internationality** (4.40) also receive strong marks. The **Accomodation** (4.22) is rated slightly lower, representing the weakest point in this overall positive assessment, though still well-regarded.

This university garners strong marks across several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.6) and **Student Life** (4.4). **Accomodation** also scores highly at 4.5. However, the university's **Internationality** is a relative weakness, receiving a rating of 3.8, indicating an area for potential improvement compared to its other strong attributes.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This institution received its highest marks for student life, boasting a rating of 3.33. Other areas, such as location and internationality, also performed reasonably well with scores of 2.67. Conversely, the university's weakest areas were facilities and accommodation, both receiving a rating of 2. The value proposition for students was rated at a solid 3.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.

Reviews summary
Highlights

This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.

With ~98% positive feedback, students praise professors, supportive learning environments, and research opportunities. A small percentage mention capacity-constrained majors as a concern.

With a 4.2/5 average rating from 5 reviews, students highlight a strong positive experience. Recurring themes include a well-structured, practical curriculum, helpful professors, and a vibrant campus life, with ~0% negative feedback.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With a 3.33/5 average, ~33% of feedback is positive. One reviewer found education good but mentioned varying doctor quality, long lectures, and many parties. No negative reviews were provided.

Nothing to show

With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
37%
20%
29%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
53%
80%
57%
33%
0%
100%
3★
0%
9%
0%
14%
67%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close