Escuela Superior de Diseño de Madrid vs Université PSL vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs National University of Political Studies and Public Administration - SNSPA vs The Courtauld Institute of Art
Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Early specialization and practical experience in design fields
- +Public university option for design in Madrid
- +Inclusive and open-minded student environment
- +Excellent educational approach and curriculum design
- +Strong internationalization and cross-cultural support
- +Strong industry connections and practical business education
- +International environment and balanced daily life
- +Excellent and varied food options
- +Practical, real-world relevance of studies
- +Dedicated, gifted lecturers and useful events
- +Collaborative atmosphere and personal development
- +Expert instructors and high-quality teaching
- +Excellent resources and vibrant campus life
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
- +Balanced theory and lab work focus
- +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsiveness from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Limited course availability and inflexible schedules frustrate students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support diminishes the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
This institution presents a consistent, though unexceptional, profile across all assessed aspects. None of the surveyed categories – facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value – stand out as particular strengths. Conversely, there are no areas that can be identified as significant weaknesses, with all receiving identical, neutral ratings.
Exceptional scores were awarded across all aspects of university assessment. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a universally strong offering with no discernible weaknesses based on these ratings. The university demonstrates outstanding performance in every surveyed area.
Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.
Student feedback indicates excellent student life, boasting a top score of 4.725. Facilities also received strong marks at 4.65. Conversely, internationality was the lowest rated aspect, scoring 4.125. Location and accommodation were also areas with slightly lower scores, both at 4.175. Professors and value were rated highly, with scores of 4.625 and 4.475 respectively.
An assessment of the university reveals strong performance in key areas, notably an outstanding rating for professors (5) and an excellent score for location (4.95). Facilities and value also received high marks (4.25). However, student life (3.2) and internationality (3.85) present areas for improvement, with accommodation being the weakest category (2.5).
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.
This university receives a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight it as a strong choice for those with clear design specialization goals, appreciating the early practical experience.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from a single review, this university is described as exceptionally inclusive, open-minded, and student-friendly, with excellent curriculum design. Internationalization and cross-cultural support are noted as significant strengths.
This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.
Students consistently praise the university's relevance to social reality and development of teamwork skills. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One reviewer praised the high quality of teaching from field experts, strong research support, excellent library, and lively events calendar. No negative feedback was recorded.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
S.N.S.P.A. is a university with students who have a huge potential and an ambition to change the world. The fields you can study here are very connected with the social reality nowadays and they give you a glimpse of what you can change for the better. I recommend it, because teachers here are very gifted and dedicated and they organize for us a lot of events, conferences, competitions, workshops which are very useful.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
