BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Information Science and Technology 'St. Paul The Apostle' vs Noroff School of Technology and Digital Media vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Kediri
Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong industry connections and practical business education
- +International environment and balanced daily life
- +Excellent and varied food options
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Comprehensive and diverse study programs
- +Good facilities
Nothing to show
- +strong technical and practical focus on systems
- +sustainability and real-world application
- +analytical thinking and problem-solving
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are common complaints.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are prevalent concerns.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unresponsive staff are common complaints.
Impressive scores characterize this institution, particularly in its **facilities**, **location**, and **internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student experience is further bolstered by a commendable **student life** and a strong **professor** evaluation. However, **accommodation** presents a notable weakness with a score of 2, and the **value** proposition sits in the middle with a rating of 3.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
This institution achieves excellent marks across several key aspects, notably receiving perfect scores for Professors, Location, and Value. Internationality also stands out with a top rating. While Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are strong with a score of 4, these represent the areas with the most room for minor improvement compared to the otherwise outstanding performance.
Nothing to show
This institution receives strong marks in several key areas. Its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at 4 out of 5. While professors and internationality are rated a respectable 3, these represent the weakest aspects of the university's profile. Overall, the university offers good value for students.
This university receives a strong average rating of 4/5, with approximately 100% of feedback being positive. Students highlight excellent industry connections, an international environment, and practical business education. The campus offers a balanced daily experience and diverse dining options.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
With a 4/5 average rating, the sole review highlights good facilities and comprehensive study programs. A minor drawback mentioned is the scattered building layout, causing student fatigue. Negative feedback is minimal.
Nothing to show
The program is highly rated at 4/5 stars, with ~100% positive feedback. Students appreciate the focus on modern society's power infrastructure and systems. The curriculum emphasizes technical skills, analytical thinking, and practical problem-solving, particularly in sustainability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show