University of Warsaw - UW vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs University of Euroregional Economy - WSGE vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University vs Civitas University
Side-by-side comparison from 186 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, engaging academic programs with career preparation
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors fostering personal and academic growth
- +Vibrant student life and attractive campus/location
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Affordable tuition and helpful staff
- +Supportive professors and direct student contact
- +Accessible location near Warsaw
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
- +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs and accreditations
- +Commitment to student development and success
- +Practical learning through internships and workshops
- -Useless and irrelevant coursework and lack of accessible information.
- -Underdeveloped course structure with insufficient classes.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and unclear communication cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
- -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
- -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.
This institution receives notably high marks across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Value**, closely followed by **Professors**, indicating excellent academic and financial returns. **Location** and **Internationality** also score very well. The weakest, though still respectable, category is **Facilities**. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with notable strengths in academic and financial aspects, with room for improvement primarily in its physical infrastructure.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in its **Professors** and **Student Life**, both achieving a high score of 4.5. The **Facilities**, **Internationality**, and **Value** also stand out with solid marks of 4.25. While **Accomodation** receives a good rating of 4, the **Location** emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.75.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.
Nothing to show
An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.
Nearly all ~99% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs, excellent professors, and a vibrant student life. A single negative review cited underdeveloped courses and difficulty accessing information.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, about 83% of feedback is highly positive. Students praise affordable tuition, helpful staff, direct lecturer support, and the university's positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.
Nothing to show
With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.
Complex concepts are easier for students to understand when presented in a well-organized succession. The curriculum at the institution creates an ideal learning atmosphere by skillfully fusing theory and real-world application. Using a variety of teaching approaches guarantees student involvement and accommodates different learning preferences. Furthermore, the curriculum places a strong emphasis on connection to the actual world, giving students hands-on experience. All things considered, the programme has been carefully designed to make learning more seamless for students and improve their understanding and utilisation of the material.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
University is very good, coordination between students and professors is nice, work ethics is appreciable,subjects related to topic and clear whole concepts about subject and atmosphere of university is very nice.
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
