Wroclaw University of Science and Technology - PWR vs University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs West Pomeranian Business School - ZPSB vs University of Opole
Side-by-side comparison from 124 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and modern facilities
- +Practical learning and career readiness
- +Vibrant student life and engaging activities
- +High-quality education with knowledgeable and supportive professors.
- +Welcoming international environment and vibrant student life in a beautiful city.
- +Practical learning and career-focused programs.
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Welcoming environment and heartwarming atmosphere
- +Manageable cost of living and food
- +Positive overall study experience
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical application of studies
- +Welcoming community and inclusive environment
- +Attentive, knowledgeable teachers and practical, job-market focused learning
- +Welcoming, multicultural environment and supportive student systems
- +Modern campus facilities and flexible learning options
- +Passionate professors and effortless learning
- +Acquisition of applicable skills
- -Administrative burdens and frequent rule changes cause student frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaged professors are a significant issue.
- -Outdated and irrelevant course content, especially for English Philology majors.
- -Lack of promised opportunities outside of specific career paths like translation or business.
- -Severely underfunded facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues caused confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hindered learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency led to disappointment.
- -Minimal learning and easy passing requirements.
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are consistently criticized.
- -Poor communication and a lack of student support are frequently mentioned.
This university receives high marks, particularly excelling in its **Location**, which scored a near-perfect 4.72. Other strong areas include **Value** (4.5) and **Facilities** (4.47). Student feedback indicates a generally positive experience across **Professors** (4.36) and **Student Life** (4.31). **Accomodation** (4.14) is also well-regarded, though slightly lower. The area with the most room for improvement appears to be **Internationality**, rated at 4.03.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The university excels in **Location**, receiving its highest score, suggesting it's a significant draw. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong ratings. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score, indicating this area could be improved. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality also maintain solid, above-average evaluations.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
Exceptional ratings were awarded across all surveyed categories, indicating a consistently strong performance for the university. Areas achieving perfect scores include facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No specific weakest areas were identified, with the institution demonstrating a uniform excellence in all assessed aspects.
This institution receives top marks for its **Facilities** and **Value**, with both scoring exceptionally high. **Student Life**, **Location**, and **Professors** are also rated positively. Areas with room for improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which received lower scores compared to other aspects. Overall, it presents a strong offering, particularly in its resources and perceived worth.
With impressive scores across most areas, the university excels in its **Facilities**, boasting a 4.6 rating. **Professors** also received a strong 4.0. The **Accomodation** category, however, stands out as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.4. Other areas like Student Life and Value are rated moderately at 3.8.
This institution excels in the quality of its **professors**, receiving a perfect score. **Facilities** and **accommodation** are also strong points, both rated at 4. However, the **internationality** is a notable weakness, scoring just 2. The **location** and **student life** are rated moderately at 3, and **value** is also a strong 4.
With a 4.46/5 average rating, ~97% of reviews are positive, praising modern facilities, supportive lecturers, and job prospects. One review criticized administrative formalities and inconsistent teaching quality.
University of Wrocław reviews are highly positive, averaging 4.36/5 based on 75 submissions. Students praise high-quality education, experienced professors, modern facilities, and a welcoming international community. A small amount of negative feedback (~4%) cites program structure and perceived lack of opportunities.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a dream-like experience. Students praise the welcoming environment and manageable living costs. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.33/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight supportive lecturers and opportunities to pursue passions. The curriculum is praised for its comprehensiveness, with early clinical contact being an advantage for medical students.
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 80% of reviews are positive, highlighting enjoyable lectures, knowledgeable professors, a modern and visually appealing campus, and a supportive, multicultural environment. Around 20% of feedback mentions a negligible passing barrier and minimal academic rigor.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, student feedback is highly positive. The single review highlights excellent professors and the acquisition of practical skills. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show