Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos - UNMSM vs Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - PUCP vs Universidad César Vallejo - UCV vs Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas - UPC vs Universidad de San Martín de Porres - USMP
Side-by-side comparison from 34 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +University prestige and academic rigor
- +Diverse student body and personal growth opportunities
- +Accessibility and good teachers
- +Rich cultural environment and diverse activities
- +High quality of education and challenging academic programs
- +Excellent campus facilities and resources
- +Supportive and engaging professors
- +Affordable education and abundant opportunities
- +Inclusive and collaborative learning environment
- +Career-focused curriculum and expert instructors
- +Professional and personal growth opportunities
- +Diverse programs and cultural immersion
- +Practical learning experiences and quality study programs
- +Supportive and innovative teaching methods
- +Good infrastructure and administrative support
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated facilities and technology
- -lack of support and communication
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major drawbacks.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Financial burden of tuition fees.
- -Lack of transparency and communication regarding policies, procedures, and academic advising.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities, including insufficient study spaces and technology.
- -Bureaucratic administrative processes and unresponsive staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
This institution presents a mixed but generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Professor quality (4.33) and Value (4). Conversely, Accomodation (2.67) stands out as the weakest aspect. Ratings for Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Internationality are all in the moderate range, around 3.67.
This institution boasts excellent ratings, particularly in its **professors** (4.75) and **student life** (4.5), alongside strong scores for **internationality** and **value** (both 4.5). Facilities also receive a positive mark at 4.25. The primary area for improvement, however, lies with **accommodation**, scoring a lower 3, and **location** at 3.75.
This institution presents a generally positive picture, excelling particularly in **Value** with a rating of 4.75 and strong marks for **Professors** (4.5) and **Student Life** (4.25). Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3. Other aspects like Facilities, Internationality, and Location fall within the good to very good range.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, both receiving high scores. Internationality and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and facilities present areas for improvement, indicating these aspects are less favorably perceived by students. Overall, the institution appears to offer a positive experience, with specific categories requiring more attention.
Overall, the university presents a consistent performance across most aspects. Its strongest areas are the quality of its professors and a vibrant student life and international community, both receiving solid 4 and 3.5 ratings respectively. Conversely, facilities and accommodation are identified as areas for improvement, each scoring a 3. The university offers a fair value proposition, also rated at 3.5.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise the university's prestige, solid education, affordability, and opportunities to meet diverse people. Some mention frustrating bureaucracy and infrastructure limitations.
Students praise the university's cultural richness, educational excellence, and diverse resources. The demanding curriculum is noted, fostering resilience. Some highlight the beautiful campus and ample student spaces.
All four reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the inclusive environment, knowledgeable and engaging professors, and ample academic and extracurricular opportunities. The university is also commended for its affordability and support for student success.
With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of students praise diverse courses, excellent teachers, and strong career preparation. One review (~11%) mentions high tuition costs.
With a 4/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight strong communications programs, good study plans, and effective teaching. Areas for improvement include curriculum updates and expanded internship/job placement agreements.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
