Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila - UAdeC vs Universidad Politecnica de Ramos Arizpe - UPRA vs Universidad politécnica de la region Laguna - UPRL vs Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro - UAAAN vs Benemerita Escuela Normal de Coahuila - BENC

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad politécnica de la region Laguna - UPRL (4.00)
Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila - UAdeC: wins 2/6 categories
Universidad Politecnica de Ramos Arizpe - UPRA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad politécnica de la region Laguna - UPRL: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro - UAAAN: wins 0/6 categories
Benemerita Escuela Normal de Coahuila - BENC: wins 0/6 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 4/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Orthodontics
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
3.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
2.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Win
Student life
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent preparation and industry-relevant programs.
  • +High-quality teachers with real-world experience.
  • +Strong reputation and global opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Well-equipped labs and specialized engineering programs
  • +High-quality faculty with advanced degrees

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are consistently described as outdated and in need of improvement.
  • -Lack of clarity and communication regarding academic matters is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as inadequate.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent marks for its **Location**, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities** are also a notable strength. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Other aspects like **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** fall within a moderate range, while **Accomodation** scores slightly below average.

Nothing to show

Across all evaluated aspects, this university received a rating of 0 for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. Consequently, no specific areas can be highlighted as strongest or weakest. The university's performance is uniformly assessed at the lowest possible mark across every category surveyed.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews praise excellent teachers and infrastructure, highlighting good preparation and regional reputation. A small percentage mention minor concerns about some teachers' knowledge or course relevance to industry.

Nothing to show

The sole review is overwhelmingly positive (100%), praising prepared professors and well-equipped engineering labs. The average rating is 4/5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Rating distribution
5★
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
58%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
26%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close