Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT

Side-by-side comparison from 8 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Salvador - USAL (4.70)
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 2/6 categories
IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV: wins 0/6 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/6 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad de la Marina Mercante: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: B.A. in Philosophy
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
3.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.67
5.00
Win
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.33
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.67
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
2.33
1.00
3.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment
  • +Supportive and active campus environment
  • +High-quality faculty and resources
  • +Well-equipped facilities for learning
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Extensive virtual and campus network
  • +Pioneer in distance education

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

This institution receives excellent marks for its **professors, location, and internationality**, all scoring a perfect 5. Student life and value are also well-regarded with 4s. However, the university's **accommodation** is a significant weakness, rated only 1. Facilities are considered average at 3.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Examining the university's performance reveals a clear dichotomy in its strengths and weaknesses. Professors are highly rated, earning a score of 4, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received a score of 0, suggesting significant areas needing considerable improvement. The university shows moderate internationality (3) and excels in terms of value for money, with a perfect score of 5.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers, equipped facilities, and a student-friendly campus environment. A minor parking inconvenience was noted.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers highlight the university's strong virtual learning environments and organized remote education system.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
67%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
33%
50%
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close