London School of Commerce - LSC vs Independent University, Bangladesh - IUB vs Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU vs The University of Asia Pacific vs Bangladesh University of Business and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The University of Asia Pacific (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/6 categories
Independent University, Bangladesh - IUB: wins 2/6 categories
Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU: wins 0/6 categories
The University of Asia Pacific: wins 3/6 categories
Bangladesh University of Business and Technology: wins 0/6 categories
Military Institute of Science and Technology: wins 1/6 categories
Dhaka University of Engineering & Technology, Gazipur (DUET) - DUET: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Business Finance
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Best programme: Aeronautical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
4.13
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.75
4.17
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Professors
3.25
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.75
4.29
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Value
2.75
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Strong academic reputation and knowledgeable, passionate professors
  • +Vibrant, inclusive atmosphere with diverse cultural opportunities and many extracurricular activities
  • +Supportive staff and well-maintained campus environment

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-designed and engaging curriculum
  • +Positive and meaningful overall experience

Nothing to show

  • +strong academics and excellent labs
  • +well-structured curriculum for theory and practice
  • +no session jams, timely graduation

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of positive and productive learning environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor administrative and management issues.

Nothing to show

  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and uninspired course content are often criticized.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Considering the provided ratings, student life stands out as the strongest aspect, with a score of 4.29. Facilities and location also received high marks. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance, with internationality and value scoring moderately well.

Nothing to show

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a consistently positive experience. The university's **Value** also receives a respectable score of 4, rounding out its generally strong performance.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its **location** and **accommodation**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities** and **student life** also score well, indicating a supportive and well-equipped campus environment. However, **professors**, **internationality**, and **value** received average ratings, suggesting potential areas for development compared to its other strengths.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Most reviews are positive (~83%), praising academic reputation, knowledgeable professors, and cultural diversity. A small amount of feedback (~12.5%) mentions the environment negatively.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights a positive and meaningful experience. This feedback emphasizes a well-planned program and experienced, supportive faculty.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from one review, the Military Institute of Science and Technology (MIST) is praised for its strong academic environment and excellent lab facilities. Students appreciate the well-structured curriculum and the absence of session jams, allowing for timely graduation.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
13%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close