Universidad Latina de Costa Rica - ULATINA vs Universidad Estatal a Distancia - UNED vs Universidad de Iberoamerica - UNIBE vs Universidad Internacional de las Américas - UIA vs Universidad latinoamericana de Ciencias y Tecnología

Side-by-side comparison from 12 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: American University of Costa Rica - UAM (5.00)
Universidad Latina de Costa Rica - ULATINA: wins 1/3 categories
Universidad Estatal a Distancia - UNED: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad de Iberoamerica - UNIBE: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad Internacional de las Américas - UIA: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad latinoamericana de Ciencias y Tecnología: wins 0/3 categories
National University of Costa Rica - UNA: wins 0/3 categories
American University of Costa Rica - UAM: wins 2/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: BA International Studies
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: System Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
2.00
Student life
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.83
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent, well-prepared professors and relevant subject matter
  • +Flexible schedules accommodating work and study
  • +Opportunities for networking and an international atmosphere
  • +Affordability and flexibility for working students
  • +National recognition and accreditation
  • +Supportive tutor access for questions

Nothing to show

  • +High quality, knowledgeable and passionate faculty with real-world experience.
  • +Well-thought-out career plans and unique degree catalog offering diverse programs.
  • +Opportunities for community involvement and skill development.

Nothing to show

  • +Comprehensive and engaging curriculum
  • +Supportive faculty availability
  • +Opportunities for athletic participation
  • +Practical, career-focused learning
  • +Experienced, real-world professors
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff create frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support regarding academic matters is a recurring issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Communication gaps lead to confusion and dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a strong profile, particularly excelling in **Location** with a rating of 4.67 and **Internationality** at 4.5. Professors and Facilities also received favorable scores. Conversely, **Student Life** emerged as the weakest area, scoring 3.5. Accommodations and value for money were moderately rated, alongside solid but not exceptional performance in facilities.

Across all surveyed categories, the institution received ratings of zero, indicating a consistent lack of performance in every area. Consequently, no specific strengths or weaknesses can be identified as all aspects of the university are performing at the same minimal level. This uniform outcome suggests a need for comprehensive review and improvement across the board.

Nothing to show

This institution exhibits a mixed performance across various aspects. Its location stands out as a significant strength, earning a perfect score. Areas like professors, student life, and value are rated competently at 3.5. Conversely, facilities, accommodation, and internationality are the weaker points, all receiving a moderate rating of 3.

Nothing to show

Overall, this university garners positive feedback with consistent ratings across most aspects. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving a perfect score of 5. Conversely, while still strong, **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** all received a solid rating of 4, indicating areas that are well-regarded but could potentially see further enhancement.

This institution excels in key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, and accommodation. Student life and facilities are also rated highly. However, its internationality score is notably lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a strong offering with excellent support services and an attractive setting, though opportunities to enhance global engagement may exist.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.29/5 average rating, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students praise flexible schedules, excellent and knowledgeable professors, and valuable career-relevant subjects. No negative reviews were provided.

This university receives predominantly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight affordability, national recognition, and the flexibility of distance learning as key strengths.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight high-quality faculty and well-designed career plans with great instructors. A unique degree catalog and community involvement opportunities were also mentioned.

Nothing to show

With one review, the National University of Costa Rica earns a 4/5 average. The feedback highlights a rewarding experience with a challenging yet engaging curriculum and supportive faculty. An athletic scholarship was also mentioned.

With one review, the sentiment is ~100% positive. Students highlight practical, career-focused learning and engaging professors with real-world experience as key strengths.

Rating distribution
5★
43%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
43%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
3★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close