London School of Commerce - LSC vs Shahid Begum Sheikh Fozilatun Nessa Mujib Govt College - https://fmgovtcollege.edu.bd/ vs Uttara University vs Notre Dame College Dhaka vs Bangladesh University of Textiles

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/2 categories
Shahid Begum Sheikh Fozilatun Nessa Mujib Govt College - https://fmgovtcollege.edu.bd/: wins 0/2 categories
Uttara University: wins 2/2 categories
Notre Dame College Dhaka: wins 0/2 categories
Bangladesh University of Textiles: wins 0/2 categories
Bangladesh Dental College: wins 0/2 categories
Sher-E-Bangla Agricultural University - SAU: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Dhaka, Bangladesh
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Best programme: Science
Best programme: Veterinary Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
5.00
5.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
5.00
5.00
5.00
2.00
4.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
3.00
2.00
4.00
Student life
3.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
3.00
5.00
Value
2.75
Not rated
5.00
5.00
3.00
1.00
5.00
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
2.00
3.00
2.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Highly qualified and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent classes and effective teaching methods
  • +Strong academic environment and rigorous assessment
  • +Fostering discipline and long-term vision
  • +Competitive and analytical thinking development

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Specialized agricultural and veterinary programs.
  • +Strong academic foundation and research opportunities.
  • +Renowned as Bangladesh's oldest agricultural institution.
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often mentioned.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support is a common concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from instructors are recurring problems.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent concerns.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed categories, this institution achieves perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weaknesses, presenting an ideal environment for students.

This institution garners exceptional ratings in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, location, and student life are all rated a perfect 5. Value for money also receives a top score. The university's internationality is strong at 4.5. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker area, with a rating of 2.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners significant praise, particularly excelling in its prime **location** and vibrant **student life**, both receiving perfect scores. Offering excellent **value** also stands out. While generally strong, the **facilities**, **professors**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** are rated slightly lower at a commendable four out of five, indicating solid but not perfect performance in these areas.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the university received a 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlighted qualified faculty and excellent classes with effective teaching methods.

Both reviews are highly positive, with students praising the college's discipline, structured academics, and effective assessment methods. These elements fostered responsibility and analytical thinking, contributing to a very favorable experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university receives excellent feedback, with 100% positive reviews. Students highlight its status as an old agricultural institution and its four faculties offering various degrees. The average rating is 4/5.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close