London School of Commerce - LSC vs Shahid Begum Sheikh Fozilatun Nessa Mujib Govt College - https://fmgovtcollege.edu.bd/ vs Patuakhali Science and Technology University vs National College of Home Economics - NCHE vs The University of Asia Pacific

Side-by-side comparison from 6 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: The University of Asia Pacific (5.00)
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/4 categories
Shahid Begum Sheikh Fozilatun Nessa Mujib Govt College - https://fmgovtcollege.edu.bd/: wins 0/4 categories
Patuakhali Science and Technology University: wins 0/4 categories
National College of Home Economics - NCHE: wins 1/4 categories
The University of Asia Pacific: wins 3/4 categories
ASA University Bangladesh: wins 0/4 categories
City University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Children
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Dhaka, Bangladesh
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.25
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.75
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.75
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Sincere and helpful teachers
  • +Classes and exams on schedule with no session congestion
  • +Future improvements expected with permanent campus
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-designed and engaging curriculum
  • +Positive and meaningful overall experience

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution excels in areas like **Professors** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present significant weaknesses, with ratings of 2. Overall, the university offers a positive experience in key academic and social aspects, though improvements are needed in housing and global integration.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a consistently positive experience. The university's **Value** also receives a respectable score of 4, rounding out its generally strong performance.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The sole review is positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight sincere teachers and timely classes/exams, while noting temporary difficulties due to the lack of a permanent campus.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights a positive and meaningful experience. This feedback emphasizes a well-planned program and experienced, supportive faculty.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close