London School of Commerce - LSC vs Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU vs Uttara University vs Dhaka Collegiate School - DCS vs The University of Asia Pacific

Side-by-side comparison from 10 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/2 categories
Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University - HSTU: wins 0/2 categories
Uttara University: wins 2/2 categories
Dhaka Collegiate School - DCS: wins 0/2 categories
The University of Asia Pacific: wins 0/2 categories
Bangladesh University: wins 0/2 categories
International University of Business Agriculture and Technology - IUBAT: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Dhaka, Bangladesh
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Human Resource Management
Best programme: Computer Science and Engineering
Dhaka, Bangladesh
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Electronics Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor in Electrical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.25
Not rated
5.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
Location
4.75
Not rated
5.00
1.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.25
Not rated
5.00
1.00
5.00
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
1.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
Student life
3.75
Not rated
5.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
Value
2.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
1.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
Accommodation
2.00
Not rated
5.00
1.00
4.00
5.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Highly qualified and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent classes and effective teaching methods
  • +Expert faculty and engaging teaching methods
  • +Strong career services and networking opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus community and student life
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Well-designed and engaging curriculum
  • +Positive and meaningful overall experience
  • +Cooperative and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Supportive administration and academic environment
  • +Practical and theoretical course design
  • +Pioneering, visionary institution
  • +Commitment to producing professional graduates
Cons
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are often mentioned.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support is a common concern.
  • -Outdated facilities, especially bathrooms.
  • -Unfair and confusing grading systems.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly implemented.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary equipment frustrate students.
  • -Inconsistent and unsupportive teaching quality leads to a poor learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are significant concerns.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed categories, this institution achieves perfect scores. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. This indicates a consistently strong offering with no discernible weaknesses, presenting an ideal environment for students.

Across all surveyed categories, this institution received uniformly excellent marks. Its strongest and weakest areas are indistinguishable, as every aspect – from facilities and professors to student life, accommodation, and internationality – was rated a perfect 1. This indicates exceptional consistency and high performance across the board, with no single area standing out as superior or lagging behind.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Areas such as **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accommodation**, and **Internationality** are all rated solidly at 4, indicating a consistently positive experience. The university's **Value** also receives a respectable score of 4, rounding out its generally strong performance.

This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating a highly supportive and engaging environment. Professors and internationality are also strong points, both rated a solid 4. The university demonstrates good value for students, also earning a 4. The weakest area, relative to its excellent performance elsewhere, is the professor rating.

This institution garners excellent marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving a perfect score of 5. **Student Life** also received a top rating of 5. The university demonstrates a strong commitment to **Internationality** and offers good **Value**, both rated at 4.5. Its **Professors** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded, each earning a 4, representing the areas with the most room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the university received a 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlighted qualified faculty and excellent classes with effective teaching methods.

This university has a single review, rating it 1/5 stars. The feedback is entirely negative, highlighting poor bathroom facilities and questionable grading practices in ICT exams.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights a positive and meaningful experience. This feedback emphasizes a well-planned program and experienced, supportive faculty.

With one review at 4/5 stars, the feedback is highly positive, highlighting a good academic environment with cooperative faculty and supportive administration. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the university's pioneering role and its founding vision. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
4★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
25%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close