Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ vs Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES vs Universidad Técnica del Norte - UTN vs Gujarat Technological University vs Universidad de las Américas - UDLA

Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universitas Diponegoro (4.90)
Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Espíritu Santo - UEES: wins 3/7 categories
Universidad Técnica del Norte - UTN: wins 1/7 categories
Gujarat Technological University: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de las Américas - UDLA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Católica de Cuenca: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Diponegoro: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Music
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Interior Design
Semarang, Indonesia
4.90
Top
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: English Literature
Category ratings
Facilities
4.32
4.80
Win
4.00
4.06
4.00
Not rated
4.55
Location
4.32
5.00
Win
3.00
4.18
4.50
Not rated
4.55
Professors
4.27
4.60
5.00
Win
4.11
4.50
Not rated
4.82
Internationality
4.14
4.40
2.00
3.21
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.27
Student life
4.36
4.60
4.00
4.18
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.10
4.60
3.00
3.58
4.00
Not rated
4.73
Win
Accommodation
3.88
4.40
Win
4.00
3.47
4.00
Not rated
4.36
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Holistic and diverse academic programs.
  • +Excellent professors and personal/professional growth.
  • +Beautiful campus and vibrant student community.
  • +Exceptional professors and learning environment
  • +Great opportunities and supportive community
  • +Excellent resources and hands-on learning

Nothing to show

  • +Innovative curriculum and practical approach
  • +Supportive and guiding professors
  • +Good facilities and flexible language options
  • +Inspiring and enriching academic experiences
  • +Access to useful digital tools and apps
  • +Fantastic campus facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic reputation and competent lecturers.
  • +Practical learning opportunities and career preparation.
  • +Affordable tuition and high educational quality.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and curriculum issues, including impractical assignments and rigid course selection.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure.
  • -Lack of focus on practical knowledge and skills.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent or poor teaching quality negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of relevant curriculum frustrate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant obstacles.
Rating summary
What students say

Students generally hold the university in high regard, with excellent scores for Student Life (4.36) and Location (4.32). Facilities also received a strong rating of 4.32. While professors (4.27) and internationality (4.14) are also well-received, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area with a rating of 3.88. Value for money is rated a respectable 4.10.

With exceptional marks across the board, this institution shines brightest in its prime **Location**, achieving a perfect score. Students also praise its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering.

Nothing to show

This university garners its highest marks in **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving a 4.18 rating. **Professors** also scored well at 4.11. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the lowest score at 3.21, closely followed by **Accomodation** at 3.47. **Value** sits at a moderate 3.58, while **Facilities** earned a respectable 4.06.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving 4.5 out of 5. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded with a rating of 4. Similarly, **Value** is rated a solid 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Facilities** at 4. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across multiple dimensions.

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Professors also received outstanding marks. Areas like Accomodation and Internationality, while still strong, show slightly lower scores compared to the overall high performance. Facilities and Location are rated very positively, as is the Value proposition.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.42/5, ~92% of reviews are positive. Students praise the university's holistic curriculum, excellent professors, and opportunities for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

All six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted excellent professors, dynamic classes, and great learning opportunities. The university also received praise for its infrastructure and student well-being support.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, ~74% are positive, praising academic programs, practical approaches, and facilities. A small ~5.3% expressed dissatisfaction with curriculum and assessment.

Students report enriching and inspiring experiences, particularly in areas like Interior Design and historical home restoration. The university provides helpful tools for progress, though some find navigating the campus and dining options challenging. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.91/5, reviews highlight Diponegoro University's strong academic reputation and quality education. Students praised competent lecturers, diverse programs, and practical learning opportunities, with no negative feedback reported.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
67%
0%
42%
50%
0%
91%
4★
42%
33%
0%
26%
50%
0%
9%
3★
8%
0%
100%
26%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close