Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad de Palermo - UP: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Anáhuac: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Panamericana: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 2/7 categories
ISDI Madrid Digital Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 3/7 categories
Instituto Tecnológico Superior de Calkiní - ITESCAM: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.30
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Communication
Aguascalientes, Mexico
4.10
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.40
4.50
4.33
4.40
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
3.80
4.50
4.25
4.70
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Professors
4.20
4.41
4.50
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.00
2.00
Internationality
3.80
4.59
3.33
4.60
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Student life
4.60
4.63
3.67
3.90
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Value
3.80
4.63
Win
4.33
3.90
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.80
4.66
Win
3.75
3.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
  • +High-quality professors with real-world experience
  • +Practical, project-based learning and career support
  • +Leadership and values development
  • +Academic excellence and practical application
  • +Supportive community and modern facilities
  • +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
  • +Strong business programs and professional connections
  • +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
  • -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
  • -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
  • -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.

This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.

The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Nothing to show

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.

University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
54%
67%
33%
60%
0%
50%
0%
4★
23%
39%
58%
40%
0%
0%
0%
3★
23%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close