Universidad Favaloro vs Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs National University of Mar del Plata vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT vs Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL

Side-by-side comparison from 9 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad Nacional de Lanus - UNLA (5.00)
Universidad Favaloro: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI: wins 0/1 categories
National University of Mar del Plata: wins 0/1 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/1 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 0/1 categories
Universidad Nacional de Lanus - UNLA: wins 1/1 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Accounting Technician
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Education
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Location
Not rated
5.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
3.00
Professors
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
5.00
3.67
Not rated
3.00
5.00
3.00
Student life
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
Not rated
5.00
4.33
Not rated
5.00
5.00
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
5.00
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
  • +Wide range of specialization options
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
  • +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers

Nothing to show

  • +Extensive virtual and campus network
  • +Pioneer in distance education
  • +Beautiful, well-maintained campus
  • +Professional, dedicated teachers
  • +Enriching, supportive learning environment
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative & management issues are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.

Nothing to show

Examining the university's performance reveals a clear dichotomy in its strengths and weaknesses. Professors are highly rated, earning a score of 4, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received a score of 0, suggesting significant areas needing considerable improvement. The university shows moderate internationality (3) and excels in terms of value for money, with a perfect score of 5.

This institution garners outstanding marks across all assessed criteria. Its strengths are evident in consistently perfect scores for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. No specific weaknesses are identified within these ratings, indicating a uniformly excellent student experience.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.

All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers highlight the university's strong virtual learning environments and organized remote education system.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is exclusively positive. Students highlight the beautiful campus and highly professional, dedicated teachers. Negative reviews are non-existent.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
33%
67%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
0%
33%
33%
0%
100%
0%
100%
3★
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close