Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana - UPB vs Royal Institute of Technology - KTH vs Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University - LNMU vs Ivan Franko National University of Lviv - LNU vs Lviv Polytechnic National University - LPNU
Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Elite academic programs and strong teachers
- +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
- +Humanistic focus and values
- +World-class facilities and inspiring study atmosphere
- +Strong academic programs with practical application and flexibility
- +Engaging and approachable instructors
- +Excellent teachers and engaging teaching methods
- +Strong sense of community and friendships
- +Good living conditions and social events
- +Quality education and practical skills
- +Supportive environment for student initiatives
- +Strong academic reputation and historical significance
- +High-quality education and practical experience
- +Vibrant student life and extracurricular activities
- +Delicious food and modern facilities
- +Excellent facilities and practical learning opportunities.
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors.
- +Positive overall study experience.
- +Engaging activities and legitimate university experience
- +Quality education and valuable attainment
- +Amazing sports opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
- -Lack of resources and support impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinder learning.
- -Outdated educational system and ill-considered practical classes.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading, often influenced by personal motives or connections.
- -Lack of professionalism and insufficient numbers of qualified teachers.
- -Poor course organization and unclear communication regarding schedules and exams.
- -Incompetent instructors and significant issues with academic integrity and potential corruption.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum design lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a frequent complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -A lack of necessary resources and support hinders learning.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Lack of engagement and accessibility from instructors is a recurring complaint.
An overall assessment of the university reveals a strong performance in several key areas. The location stands out as a particular strength with a rating of 4.6, closely followed by professors at 4.2 and value at 4.4. Facilities and internationality also received a solid 4. Student life is rated moderately at 3.8. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a considerably lower score of 2.2.
Exceptional marks were awarded in several key areas, notably a perfect score for **Internationality**. **Facilities** and **Value** also received very high ratings. The university performs well across **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, with solid scores for **Professors** and **Location**. While no area received a low rating, **Location** represents the comparatively weakest aspect among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners significant praise for its accommodations and professor quality, both receiving top marks. Areas for improvement include its facilities, internationality, and location, all rated at a moderate level. Student life and overall value are considered strong points, reflecting a positive student experience.
This institution shows a strong showing in its **location**, earning a high rating. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Other areas, including facilities, professors, and value, fall within a moderate range. Student life also scored lower, while accommodation received a favorable rating.
This institution garners excellent marks for its prime **location (5)** and solid performance in **facilities (4)** and **value (4)**. However, areas like **student life (3)** and **accommodation (3)** received more moderate evaluations, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality and professor quality both scored at a respectable 3.67.
With consistently average ratings across all surveyed categories, this institution presents a uniform experience. No specific area stands out as a particular strength or weakness. The institution appears to offer a neutral environment in terms of facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
This institution demonstrates a remarkably consistent performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest asset with a perfect score. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and value all receive solid marks, indicating a well-rounded educational experience. There are no significantly weak areas identified, reflecting a high level of satisfaction across most aspects.
With 12 out of 13 reviews being positive, students highly praise the university's strong tradition, excellent teachers, and quality facilities. Key themes include a humanist approach, elite orientation in economics, and good learning methodologies, with ~92% of feedback being highly positive.
All 12 reviews are positive, averaging 4.75/5. Students praise world-class research facilities, inclusive culture, and opportunities for theory-practice integration. Friendly, engaging instructors and diverse, flexible courses are also highlighted.
About 50% of reviews praise the university atmosphere, supportive teachers, and city, while a small percentage of feedback (around 9%) cites issues like lack of practice and corruption.
About 68% of reviews are positive, highlighting good educational quality, opportunities for goals, and strong traditions. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions disorganized study processes and issues with some professors.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~94% favorable). Students praise high-level teachers, practical work, diverse extracurricular activities, and excellent education. A few mention minor issues with facilities and administrative speed.
With one review, the university is rated 4/5 stars. This feedback is approximately 100% positive, highlighting good facilities, practical classes, and exchange program opportunities. Some professors were noted as less effective, but many were praised.
With one review, the university receives a 4/5 rating. This student found activities legitimate and sports, like basketball, amazing. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
If be really honest our medical university has many different problems. But I want to start from pluses: first - if you want to study- you may do it, second - most of the teachers are really good, third - there are just two pluses:))) Minuses- 1) the greatest problem is that you haven't any practice (except some rare cases). 2) low level of English 3) you have no chance to choose what you prefer to study 4) corruption (sometimes your ratings do not depend on you)
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show