Bina Nusantara University - UBN vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs University of Indonesia - UI vs Universitas Pertamina vs Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI

Side-by-side comparison from 60 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Jayabaya University (5.00)
Bina Nusantara University - UBN: wins 2/7 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 2/7 categories
University of Indonesia - UI: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Pertamina: wins 0/7 categories
Trisakti Insurance Business School - STMA TRISAKTI: wins 0/7 categories
Jayabaya University: wins 3/7 categories
STIE Indonesia Jakarta: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Art and Design
Jakarta, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Jakarta, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Public Relations
Jakarta, Indonesia
4.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.43
4.25
4.22
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
4.15
4.75
Win
4.37
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.50
Professors
4.64
4.75
4.50
Not rated
4.33
5.00
Win
4.50
Internationality
4.71
4.75
Win
4.33
Not rated
3.67
3.00
4.00
Student life
4.21
4.00
4.42
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.57
Win
4.50
4.42
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.50
Accommodation
4.38
Win
4.00
4.14
Not rated
3.33
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse study programs and numerous student organizations
  • +Supportive lecturers and accommodating, modern facilities
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and peer connection
  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities
  • +Strong academic programs and faculty expertise
  • +Opportunities for practical application and professional development
  • +Supportive community and valuable alumni network

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Diverse range of programs and majors
  • +Good course material and practical applications
  • +Practical application and project engagement
  • +Comprehensive curriculum coverage
  • +Strong practical and theoretical business and economics programs
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty
  • +Real-world application and industry relevance
Cons
  • -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.
  • -Lack of alignment between course outlines and actual class content.
  • -Substandard experience for international students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently poor.
  • -Inconsistent and poor communication from administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support for academic and personal needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Across various evaluated aspects, this institution receives strong marks. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by its professors and overall value. Accommodation and student life also score very well. The weakest performing category, though still positive, is location.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings across multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Student life and value for money are also rated very highly. The weakest area, though still positive, is accommodation. Facilities and location also score well, demonstrating a generally positive student experience.

Nothing to show

Student feedback paints a generally positive picture, with **Student Life** standing out as the strongest area at 4.5. **Professors** also receive high marks. The university's **Accomodation** is identified as the weakest point, with a rating of 3.33. Overall, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Value** are consistently rated well, indicating a solid institutional offering.

The university garners exceptionally strong scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings awarded for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life. Location and Accommodation are also positively rated at a 4 out of 5. Its weakest area appears to be Internationality, scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, with a strong emphasis on the student experience and academic quality.

Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly excelling in the areas of **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving 4.5 stars. **Value** also scores highly at 4.5. Its **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality** are all consistently rated at a solid 4 stars, indicating well-rounded strengths. No specific areas were rated below 4 stars.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students highlight engaging study programs, personal growth opportunities, and accommodating lecturers and facilities. Extracurriculars and modern campuses are also frequently praised.

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

University of Indonesia receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%), with students praising its academic rigor, professional lecturers, and diverse opportunities for personal and professional growth. A small percentage of negative reviews mention specific program discrepancies.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise knowledgeable lecturers and well-balanced curricula. One reviewer noted minor issues with class registration and system functionality.

This single review is highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights Jayabaya's programs effectively combining theory with practical application, through projects and case studies.

Based on two reviews with an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight enriching educational experiences, well-designed curricula blending theory with practical application, and knowledgeable, invested faculty.

Rating distribution
5★
64%
50%
64%
0%
33%
100%
50%
4★
36%
50%
31%
0%
67%
0%
50%
3★
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

International student office

I wouldn't recommend UI for Masters students especially for Faculty of Business. The course outlines are sexed up, but when it comes to class its opposite. If you're an international, better to find any other programs.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close