University of Calcutta vs Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology vs Ecole Intuit Lab vs Vidyasagar University vs Presidency University

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Calcutta: wins 0/3 categories
Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology: wins 0/3 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/3 categories
Vidyasagar University: wins 3/3 categories
Presidency University: wins 0/3 categories
IEM Kolkata - IEM Kolkata: wins 0/3 categories
Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Botany
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.87
3.57
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.39
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.30
3.14
Not rated
4.50
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.22
4.14
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.39
3.86
Not rated
4.50
Win
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.70
3.43
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Experienced and supportive faculty
  • +Rich academic legacy and learning environment
  • +Vibrant campus life and extracurricular activities
  • +Excellent and supportive faculty
  • +Vibrant campus life and activities
  • +Strong technical education and infrastructure

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive learning environment and friendly professors
  • +Scenic campus and nature-focused programs
  • +Contributions to regional development
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and supportive faculty
  • +Opportunities for personal exploration and growth

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including lack of campus and attendance policies.
  • -Poor university affiliation leading to a negative overall experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Inconsistent or unclear communication from instructors and staff.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often cited.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across several key metrics, this university demonstrates a strong performance. Its highest-rated aspects include Location, scoring an impressive 4.87, closely followed by Professors and Value, both at 4.39. Student Life also receives a commendable rating of 4.22. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, with a score of 3.30, and Accomodation, rated at 3.70.

This institution receives positive marks across multiple facets. Its strongest areas are its Professors and Student Life, both scoring above 4. The University also fares well in Facilities and Value. Areas requiring further attention include Internationality and Accomodation, which are rated the lowest. Location also shows room for improvement.

Nothing to show

Consistently high marks across the board indicate a well-rounded institution. The university excels in core aspects like facilities, professors, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score. Internationality and value for money are also strong, noted at 4.5. This suggests a particularly positive experience for students in terms of campus resources, academic quality, and campus community.

The university excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation. Its international presence is also notable with a strong rating of 4. However, the university's academic offerings are a point of concern, receiving a lower rating for professors. Value for money is its weakest aspect, scoring only 2.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most students praise the strong academic environment, supportive faculty, and good learning atmosphere, reflected in a 4.17/5 average rating. A small percentage express dissatisfaction with infrastructure and student politics.

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~86% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.14/5. Students highlight good faculty and infrastructure, though one review mentioned weak placements.

Nothing to show

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a supportive learning environment, friendly professors, and a suitable campus for nature and environmental studies.

The single review highlights a good environment, faculty, and opportunities for exploration. Placement is noted as less due to global recessions. The average rating is 5/5, with no negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
48%
29%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
26%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
22%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close