Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC vs Universidad Nacional de Colombia vs Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES vs Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO vs Universidad Libre - UniLibre

Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Externado de Colombia - UEC: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Nacional de Colombia: wins 0/6 categories
Corporación de Educación Superior - ISES: wins 0/6 categories
Corporación Universitaria Minuto de Dios - UNIMINUTO: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Libre - UniLibre: wins 4/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.62
4.07
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.54
4.92
Not rated
3.80
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.69
4.86
Not rated
4.17
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.31
Win
4.21
Not rated
3.00
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.54
4.84
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
Value
4.62
4.79
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
4.42
3.79
Not rated
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality, specialized programs
  • +Excellent professors and diverse student body
  • +Opportunities for international experience and professional growth
  • +High academic quality and knowledgeable professors.
  • +Personal and professional growth opportunities.
  • +Positive and supportive campus environment.
  • +Relevant programs leading to career success
  • +Contribution to economic growth
  • +Accessible and opportunity-focused education for diverse backgrounds
  • +Engaging and interactive learning with skilled, supportive professors
  • +Practical programs promoting personal and professional growth
  • +High-quality academics and clinical programs with qualified instructors.
  • +Focus on humanities, values, and leadership development for societal impact.
  • +Supportive learning environment with approachable teachers and accessible facilities.

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication contribute to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent course quality and teaching standards are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum.
  • -Poor syllabus quality and outdated academic programs are disappointing.
  • -There are significant administrative and management issues present.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often criticized.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates very strong performance, with its highest marks awarded to Professors (4.69) and its Facilities and Value (both 4.62). Location and Student Life also received excellent scores (4.54). The area with the lowest rating, though still respectable, is Internationality (4.31), followed closely by Accomodation (4.42).

This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly for its Location and Student Life, both approaching a perfect score. Professors also receive near-perfect ratings. While Internationality and Value are strong, Facilities are rated moderately well. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, indicating a need for improvement in this category.

This institution presents a uniform and notably low rating across all assessed aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received zero marks, indicating significant areas for improvement in every category. There are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses as all areas are performing at the same low level.

This institution shines particularly in its value for money, boasting a 4.5 rating. Facilities and student life also received strong marks at 4.2, closely followed by professors at 4.17. However, accommodation and internationality represent areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Location, while decent at 3.8, is not a standout feature compared to the university's strengths.

This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value, all scoring a perfect five. Professors are also highly regarded, with a strong 4.5 rating. The university's weakest area is internationality, which received a 3.5, indicating room for growth in that aspect.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.61 average rating, students praise its quality programs, excellent facilities, and international opportunities for professional growth. No negative feedback was recorded among the 18 reviews.

With a 4.75/5 average, ~100% of 32 reviews are positive. Students praise excellent academic quality, highly qualified professors, and a supportive, professional environment. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review, this institution has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single review is highly positive, recommending the institution for its academic programs and their contribution to economic growth.

With 5 positive reviews (~63%) and 1 negative (~12.5%), students highlight accessible education and practical programs. Some appreciate teacher quality and learning technology, while one found syllabus issues in a specific program.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise academic excellence, qualified teachers, and facilities, along with a focus on humanities and values.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
61%
81%
100%
43%
33%
0%
100%
4★
39%
13%
0%
29%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
6%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close