Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG vs Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB vs Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 3/6 categories
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada - UMNG: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de San Buenaventura - USB: wins 1/6 categories
Universidad Católica de Colombia - UCATOLICA: wins 0/6 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Entrepreneurship
Best programme: Industrial Engineering
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.20
4.00
5.00
Win
3.50
Not rated
4.00
Location
Not rated
4.80
4.50
4.00
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
Not rated
4.60
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
Not rated
4.40
5.00
5.00
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
Not rated
4.40
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
Not rated
4.60
Win
4.00
2.00
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
Not rated
4.25
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Excellent faculty and academic level
  • +Relevant and practical learning experiences
  • +Attractive and accessible campus locations
  • +High academic quality and relevant programs
  • +Strong English language focus
  • +Blend of nature and academic facilities
  • +Strong academic programs with qualified instructors and research opportunities.
  • +Practical learning experiences and updated course content.
  • +Accessible location and vibrant campus life.

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and student support is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a common source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as inflexible or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum is sometimes perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

This institution receives excellent feedback, with its **Internationality rating standing out at a perfect 5**. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all scored a solid 4, indicating strong overall offerings. Location is also a notable strength at 4.5. The Value rating is also good at 4. While no areas are weak, the strongest performing category is clearly Internationality.

Excelling in its facilities and international appeal, this institution garners top marks in those areas. Student life, professor quality, and location also receive strong positive feedback, indicating a well-rounded experience. However, the university's value for money is notably lower, standing out as its weakest aspect.

This institution demonstrates a strong performance in several key areas, particularly excelling in **location** with a rating of 4.5. **Professors**, **student life**, and **accommodation** also received favorable scores of 4. The university's **internationality** is its weakest area, rated at 3. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.5, while the overall **value** is considered good at 4.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5 stars. Students highlight excellent professors, a strong academic level, and appealing campuses. One review mentioned administrative improvements are needed.

With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, feedback is entirely positive. Students praise the university's strong academic quality, emphasis on English language education, and adaptation to labor needs. The natural campus environment and excellent facilities are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight qualified instructors, strong research promotion, and efforts to improve practical education. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
40%
40%
100%
33%
0%
100%
4★
0%
40%
60%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close