Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA vs Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía vs Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA vs Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC vs Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO

Side-by-side comparison from 13 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administración - CESA: wins 4/4 categories
Gato Dumas Colegio de Gatronomía: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Santo Tomas - USTA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Colegio Mayor de Cundinamarca - UCMC: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Piloto de Colombia - UNIPILOTO: wins 0/4 categories
Asociación Colombiana de Facultades de Administración - ASCOLFA: wins 0/4 categories
Universidad Antonio Nariño: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Best programme: BSC Medical Laboratory Technology
Best programme: Architecture
Best programme: Psychological and Behavioural Science
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.20
3.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
5.00
Not rated
4.80
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Professors
5.00
Not rated
4.60
5.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
5.00
Not rated
4.40
2.00
5.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.40
3.00
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Value
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.60
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.33
Accommodation
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.25
3.00
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Prestigious reputation and quality education
  • +Professors' real-world marketing experience
  • +Enhanced career prospects and labor market opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +High quality programs and professional teachers
  • +Supportive and amazing study environment with extracurriculars
  • +Emphasis on practical skills and real-world preparation
  • +Expert faculty and hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and in-demand programs
  • +Convenient campus access
  • +Emphasis on fostering individual creative development.
  • +High-quality education and professional training across diverse fields.
  • +Focus on personal growth and becoming better individuals.

Nothing to show

  • +Expertly trained and specialized faculty
  • +Strong academic quality and comprehensive education
  • +Focus on student well-being and real-world readiness
Cons
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities are a common complaint.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations cause frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication is often poor and unhelpful.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations contribute to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are frequently cited.
  • -Inconsistent and unhelpful administrative support causes frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of individual attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.
Rating summary
What students say

Across the board, this institution achieves outstanding marks, with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Consequently, there are no clear weakest areas to identify; every aspect surveyed received the highest possible rating, indicating a consistently strong performance. This suggests a well-rounded and highly desirable university experience.

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were achieved in several areas, notably for **Location** (4.8) and **Professors** (4.6), along with strong **Value** (4.6). While still positive, **Facilities** and **Accommodation** received the lowest scores at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Overall, the university presents a highly regarded environment, with particular strengths in its accessible setting and teaching quality.

This institution demonstrates a notable strength in the quality of its professors, receiving a perfect score. Conversely, its location received no rating, indicating a potential area for improvement or a lack of data. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and accommodation were moderately rated, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience. Internationality scores were lower, and value for money was rated well.

An impressive showing across several key areas, this institution excels particularly in its **professors and internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, location, student life, and accommodation are all rated highly at a strong 4 out of 5. The university also scores well for **value**, indicating a positive return for students.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its faculty and location, both receiving perfect scores. Students also appear to highly value the university's offerings, indicated by a strong rating for value. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, student life, and accommodation, which received the lowest scores. Facilities are rated moderately well.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a single review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating, indicating ~100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlighted prestigious education and experienced marketing professors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise high-quality study programs, excellent teachers, and a supportive environment for academic and extracurricular activities. Practical skills and hands-on experience are also highlighted.

With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise the excellent faculty, good clinical sites, and the seamless integration of theory and practice. Accessibility via public transport or car is also highlighted.

With an average rating of 5/5 stars, the 2 reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students appreciate the freedom to explore creative processes and the university's reputation for high-quality education across various fields.

Nothing to show

All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students consistently praise the university's well-prepared and specialized faculty, highlighting their ability to impart knowledge and prepare students for their professions.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
0%
40%
100%
100%
0%
100%
4★
0%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close