Universidad Industrial de Santander - UIS vs Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi Ouzou University - UMMTO vs Danish School of Media and Journalism - DMJX vs South East European University - SEEU vs Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA

Side-by-side comparison from 16 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: South East European University - SEEU (4.30)
Universidad Industrial de Santander - UIS: wins 3/6 categories
Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi Ouzou University - UMMTO: wins 0/6 categories
Danish School of Media and Journalism - DMJX: wins 0/6 categories
South East European University - SEEU: wins 3/6 categories
Colegio de Estudios Superiores de Administracion - CESA: wins 0/6 categories
King George's Medical University - AVA: wins 0/6 categories
Mahasaraswati Denpasar University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Engineering of Computing Systems
Best programme: Architecture and Urban Planning
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
2.50
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.50
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.50
Win
3.00
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.50
2.50
Not rated
4.60
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.50
Win
2.50
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive community and personal growth opportunities
  • +High-quality teaching and rigorous academic programs
  • +Strong research focus and excellent infrastructure
  • +Scenic campus and natural environment
  • +Peaceful and calming atmosphere
  • +High reputation and demanding admission
  • +Valuable internships and international opportunities
  • +Supportive and helpful staff and professors
  • +Modern facilities and welcoming campus environment
  • +Career preparation and skill development opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical focus and outdated facilities.
  • -Poor quality of some teachers and inadequate laboratory equipment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities and resources are frequently described as outdated or insufficient.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are sometimes perceived as uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modernization.
  • -Ineffective communication and administrative issues.
  • -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptionally high ratings across most surveyed categories. Its strongest areas are **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** all demonstrate excellent performance with a 4.5 rating. **Value** also scores a strong 4.5. Notably, there are no weak areas identified in this rating system, with all scores being highly positive.

An analysis of recent ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive academic environment. The university excels notably in the quality of its professors, receiving a high score of 4.5. Conversely, its weakest areas are facilities and accommodation, both rated at 2.5. Other aspects such as location, student life, internationality, and overall value are consistently rated at a moderate 3.

An examination of the university's performance reveals consistent mediocrity. Across all surveyed categories, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, the institution received a rating of zero. This indicates no identifiable strengths or weaknesses, with every aspect performing at the lowest possible level. The complete absence of positive or negative distinctions suggests a uniform and unexceptional standing.

This institution garners exceptional marks, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a perfect score of 5. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Value are also remarkably high at 4.6. Student Life and Accommodation are well-regarded at 4.4, while Location, at 4.2, represents the lowest score. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong commitment to its students and academic offerings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are largely positive (~86%) with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students praise academic rigor, supportive professors, and personal growth opportunities. One negative review highlights a focus on theory over practical application and concerns about lab teacher quality.

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~50% express positive sentiment focusing on scenic views and a peaceful environment. There is no negative feedback present.

With a single review, the Danish School of Media and Journalism has a 4/5 rating, indicating approximately 100% positive sentiment. The positive feedback highlights a strong reputation and a well-structured bachelor's program with internships.

With a 4.33 average rating from 6 reviews, all feedback is positive. Students praise convenient campus living, supportive staff, and well-taught courses. Modern facilities and career guidance are also highlighted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
43%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
4★
43%
50%
100%
67%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Good reputation

The Danish School of Media and Journalism has a very good reputation. It has a reputation (in Denmark at least) that it is hard to be accepted to the school. There are different educations offered at DMJX and I took a bachelor in communication. It's a broad education which includes 2 times 6 months internships and an international semester. It's 7 semesters long - 3,5 years. I must admit despite the school's good reputation a lot of things didn't go according to plan and at the point, the classes were too easy. The school had bad communication itself; even kept in mind, that the communications education is new there - I hope they have improved this. Other than that it IS a good school, which will soon move to new buildings from the iconic one it "lives" in now.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close