Tulane University vs Mumbai University vs Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya - DAVV vs Rostov State University of Economics vs Army Public College

Side-by-side comparison from 86 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya - DAVV (4.60)
Tulane University: wins 0/7 categories
Mumbai University: wins 0/7 categories
Devi Ahilya Vishwavidyalaya - DAVV: wins 4/7 categories
Rostov State University of Economics: wins 0/7 categories
Army Public College: wins 1/7 categories
University of Gujrat: wins 0/7 categories
University of Sialkot: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Art History
Mumbai, India
4.00
Read more reviews
65 reviews
×
Best programme: Commerce
Best programme: Bachelor of Commerce and Media (PR)
sialkot, Pakistan
1.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
sialkot, Pakistan
3.50
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
sialkot, Pakistan
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Biotechnology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
3.55
4.57
Win
Not rated
1.00
2.00
3.67
Location
4.63
4.10
4.60
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
3.67
Professors
4.13
3.83
4.43
Not rated
3.00
4.00
4.67
Win
Internationality
4.00
3.28
4.14
Win
Not rated
1.00
4.00
4.00
Student life
4.38
3.85
4.57
Win
Not rated
1.00
4.00
4.00
Value
4.25
4.06
4.29
Not rated
1.00
3.50
4.33
Win
Accommodation
4.13
3.28
4.14
Win
Not rated
2.00
1.50
3.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging faculty and mentorship
  • +Vibrant student life and diverse community
  • +Unique New Orleans experience and opportunities
  • +Comprehensive course offerings and accessible education
  • +Engaging practical sessions and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Streamlined application and submission processes
  • +Strong academic programs and practical learning
  • +Supportive faculty and helpful staff
  • +Valuable career preparation and placement assistance

Nothing to show

  • +Strong marketing and business programmes
  • +Excellent career services and networking opportunities
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Excellent academic programs and quality teaching
  • +Supportive and engaging learning environment
  • +Strong career services and future opportunities
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Welcoming and well-maintained campus facilities
  • +Quality education with practical exposure and involvement opportunities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and relevance in curriculum content is disliked.
  • -Administrative inefficiency and poor management are significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and the reality of the college experience differ from promotions.
  • -Frustration with administrative and management issues.
  • -Disappointment in outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of career support and relevant practical experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of extracurricular activities and facilities.
  • -Insufficient teacher support.
  • -Perceived favoritism towards students from army backgrounds.
  • -Franchise model issues and imposed products.
  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -The facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -They feel there is a lack of academic support and career guidance.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners solid reviews, with its strongest areas being **Value** (4.25) and **Accomodation/Professors** (both 4.125). **Location** also scores well at 4.111. The **weakest** point is **Student Life**, rated at 3.889. Ratings for **Facilities** and **Internationality** are consistently good at 4.0.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **professors** also earned positive scores. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings. Overall, the university offers a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing location and value, with opportunities to enhance the student experience in other aspects.

This institution garners excellent feedback across multiple facets, with its Location being the top-rated area. Facilities and Student Life also received very strong scores. Areas receiving the most moderate ratings include Accomodation and Internationality, followed closely by Value. Professors are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in its **location**, receiving a perfect score. However, it faces significant challenges, with critically low ratings in **facilities**, **student life**, **internationality**, and **value**. The performance in **accommodations** and **professors** falls within the lower range, indicating areas requiring substantial improvement across the board beyond its prime geographical placement.

Assessing the university reveals a mixed but largely positive picture. The institution excels in its prime **location** and strong **internationality**, both scoring a high 4.5 and 4 respectively. Student life and professor quality also receive commendable ratings of 4. The weakest areas are its **accommodation**, with a low score of 1.5, and its **facilities**, rated at 2. Its value proposition sits at a respectable 3.5.

This institution garners notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving an impressive 4.67 rating. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded, both scoring a solid 4. Opportunities for value are similarly high, assessed at 4.33. Conversely, areas for potential improvement include facilities, location, and accommodation, each averaging 3.67.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise instructors, extracurriculars, friendly peers, and the unique New Orleans location.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good learning experiences, helpful staff, and a wide range of courses. A small percentage (4.6%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiency and concerns about course relevance.

All 7 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.57/5. Students praise strong career preparation, helpful faculty, and excellent industry connections.

Nothing to show

The sole review is negative, rating the university 1 out of 5 stars. This feedback highlights a lack of extracurricular activities, insufficient facilities, and a perceived bias towards students from military backgrounds.

With an average rating of 3.5/5 and equal positive and negative feedback, students express mixed sentiments. One positive review highlights a strong recommendation, while the negative review points to issues with franchise-based practices and imposed products.

Students highly recommend the University of Sialkot, with 100% positive feedback. Recurring themes include supportive faculty, a positive learning environment, and good campus facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
35%
57%
0%
0%
50%
33%
4★
75%
38%
43%
0%
0%
0%
67%
3★
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

specialisation in literature

The faculty and university is good. But, if you an't to take admission in french department then take admission only if you have a keen interest in literature and history. Because this department specialises in those domains. But, if you want to explore other practical applications of language such as linguistics and translation. In that case, considering other universities is a better option. Because literature is very heavy and everybody does not has the capacity to handle all of that.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close