Mataram University - Unram vs European University - Republic of Macedonia - EURM vs Sheffield University Management School vs Metropolitan Business School vs Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Hauts-de-France - INSA HdF

Side-by-side comparison from 14 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Hauts-de-France - INSA HdF (4.60)
Mataram University - Unram: wins 1/7 categories
European University - Republic of Macedonia - EURM: wins 0/7 categories
Sheffield University Management School: wins 4/7 categories
Metropolitan Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Institut National des Sciences Appliquées Hauts-de-France - INSA HdF: wins 2/7 categories
Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram: wins 0/7 categories
Politeknik Pertanian Negeri Kupang: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Sheffield, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Management
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Audiovisual and Multimedia Communication
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.43
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.14
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.71
Win
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.71
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.14
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.29
Win
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
4.50
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse and complete study programs
  • +Improved facilities and infrastructure
  • +Strong graduate employability

Nothing to show

  • +Inclusive and diverse student life opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Engaging programs and enriching experiences
  • +Friendly people and strong community
  • +Pleasant learning environment and competent professors

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -The facilities are outdated and in need of renovation.
  • -The quality of teaching and curriculum is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution receives excellent marks in several key areas, with Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accomodation all rated a strong 4.5. Internationality and Value are also highly regarded at 4 and 4 respectively. The most significant weakness identified is its Location, which received a score of 0.

Nothing to show

This institution earns top marks in several key areas, notably its **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a perfect 5 out of 5. Its **Accomodation** and **Value** also score well, with 4 out of 5. The weakest area appears to be **Professors**, rated at 3 out of 5, suggesting this might be an opportunity for improvement.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates excellent performance in key academic areas, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Facilities and Value are also strong points. Student Life and Location are well-regarded, while Accommodation offers a solid score. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality. Overall, the institution presents a positive picture, particularly concerning its teaching staff and educational offerings.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 3.6/5, university reviews are predominantly positive (~60%). Students appreciate the diverse study programs and career prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~20%) points to less than ideal facilities, though some improvements have been noted.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback highlights inclusivity and a wide variety of societies. This single review found the university impressive and innovative.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.57/5 from 7 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a pleasant learning environment, competent professors, and life-enriching experiences.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
20%
0%
0%
0%
71%
0%
0%
4★
40%
0%
100%
0%
14%
0%
0%
3★
20%
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
100%
2★
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close