Universidad Politécnica de Madrid - UPM vs The University of Manchester vs Université de Guyane - UG vs École d'ingénieurs du Numérique - ISEP vs University Gregório Semedo - UGS
Side-by-side comparison from 435 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Expert faculty and high academic rigor
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Excellent campus facilities and vibrant student life
- +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
- +High quality teaching and academic programmes
- +Vibrant and welcoming student and campus life
- +Dedicated lecturers fostering critical thinking
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Strong, practical academic curriculum and industry connections
- +Experienced and approachable professors
- +Good preparation for the job market
Nothing to show
- +Quality education & dedicated lecturers
- +Opportunities for academic and professional growth
- +Strong student support & practical application
- +Patient, effective teachers
- +Well-equipped labs and comfortable facilities
- +Engaging cultural and educational events
- -Supervisor and faculty issues are a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and IT services are a problem.
- -Courses and curriculum are often perceived as irrelevant and unhelpful for future careers.
- -Course content and delivery often irrelevant to assignments and practical application.
- -Outdated or non-functional facilities hinder practical learning.
- -Poor course organization and inaccessible professors.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -Unclear communication and insufficient support contribute to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated curriculum are disliked.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are significant problems.
- -Inflexible policies and bureaucratic processes create frustration.
This institution demonstrates a robust performance across several key areas. Student life and location stand out as its strongest aspects, achieving the highest ratings. Conversely, accommodation and professors received the lowest scores. Internationality, facilities, and value for money all fall within a commendable mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional student experience.
This university scores highest in Internationality and Location, both receiving excellent ratings. Student Life and Facilities are also strong, reflecting a positive campus experience. The weakest area for the institution is Accommodation, which received a significantly lower score compared to other aspects. Value for money is rated moderately well, indicating a generally positive perception of the overall educational offering.
This institution excels in the area of **Value**, receiving a perfect score. **Professors** are also highly regarded, earning a strong rating. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** all scored zero, indicating significant areas for improvement. **Internationality** is rated moderately well, while **Accommodation** shows a slightly positive, though still low, score.
This institution receives exceptional scores for its dedicated professors and excellent value, both earning a perfect 5. Its facilities are also highly regarded with a 4.5 rating. While student life, accommodation, internationality, and location all receive solid 4-star reviews, these represent the areas with the most room for improvement compared to the university's standout strengths.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves top marks, with near-perfect scores for **Location** and **Value**, indicating exceptional advantages in these areas. The **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life** are also highly regarded, all receiving a strong 4.5 rating. Conversely, **Accommodations** and **Internationality** are the lowest-rated aspects, though still solid at 4.0. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture.
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly excelling in Professor quality, Location desirability, and vibrant Student Life, all earning perfect scores. Accommodations and Internationality are also highly rated. Facilities are considered strong. The most notable area for improvement, relative to its otherwise excellent scores, is Facilities, though it still garners a positive rating.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising high academic standards, expert teachers, and a positive university environment. A small percentage of feedback, around 7.6%, mentions issues with outdated infrastructure or unsupportive faculty.
With a 4.26/5 average rating from 323 reviews, ~88% are positive. Students praise knowledgeable professors, accessible resources, and a welcoming campus culture. A small ~1.2% of feedback noted issues with course organization or specific teaching practices.
This university has a single review, rating it 4/5 stars. The feedback highlights devoted lecturers and tutors who foster critical thinking in students, preparing them for the future. No negative reviews were received.
With an average rating of 5/5 based on two reviews, student feedback is entirely positive. Recurring themes highlight the academic curriculum and industry connections, as well as practical, job-market-focused courses taught by experienced professors.
Nothing to show
Both reviews are positive (4-5 stars), contributing to an average rating of 4.5/5. Students express strong satisfaction, highlighting the educational opportunity and value of the institution.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise well-equipped labs, patient teachers, and air-conditioned rooms. Monthly cultural and educational activities are also highlighted as a positive aspect.
This university is probably the best an engineering student could ever attend in Spain. It offers the best bachelors degree en Spain for most of its engineering programs, and some of them are at the top at Europe and even the whole world
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
