Nazarbayev University - NU vs Keimyung University vs Plovdiv Medical University - PMU vs Petroleum Training Institute - PTI vs College of Nursing Sciences Asaba
Side-by-side comparison from 44 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
Nothing to show
- +Valuable practical skills and clinical exposure
- +Diverse and collaborative international student community
- +High-quality, industry-relevant training
- +International exposure and practical learning
- +Strong reputation and employment prospects
- +Engaging teaching and supportive instructors.
- +Relevant curriculum and practical learning.
- +Positive campus atmosphere and student life.
- +Freshness of a new institution
- +Modern curriculum and infrastructure
- +Caring and exceptional professors
- +Positive life impact and decisions
- +Strong post-conflict reconstruction environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency.
- -Inflexible and unengaging course structures.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a major concern.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Pervasive low morale among students and staff.
- -Lack of institutional vision and innovation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and communication from staff is a common concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support and communication from staff is a common complaint.
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, notably achieving a perfect score in **Internationality** (5). It also excels in **Location** (4.5), with robust ratings for **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** (all 4). The primary area for potential improvement is **Student Life**, which received a lower rating of 3.
The university excels in two key areas, earning a perfect score for Value and an outstanding 4.67 for both Facilities and Accommodation. Student life and location also score well, with both receiving 4.33. Professors and Internationality are rated a solid 4. The university's weakest areas are its teaching staff and its global appeal.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving strong ratings of 4. Conversely, its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** are areas of concern, each scoring a low 1. **Accomodation** and **Value** fall in the middle, with scores of 2. Overall, the university offers a positive social and geographical experience, but faces significant challenges in academic and infrastructure support.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Professors, Location, and Internationality, and a strong 5 for Value. Student Life also scores well at 4. Conversely, Facilities are identified as a significant weakness with a rating of 0. Accommodations fall in the middle with a 3.
This institution excels with top marks in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, indicating a vibrant and well-supported academic and social environment. Accommodation and Internationality also received strong scores. While **Facilities** were rated positively, they represent the lowest-scoring area, suggesting room for enhancement in that regard. Overall, the university offers excellent value.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
Nothing to show
With two positive reviews and an average rating of 4/5, students highlight the University's strong focus on medical sciences and excellent clinical practice opportunities. The inclusive community with international and local students is also a recurring positive theme.
All three reviews are positive, giving a perfect 5/5 average. Students highlight the institution's strong focus on dedication and perfectionism, international training, and practical, industry-standard approaches to engineering and science education, particularly in Oil and Gas.
One review indicates a 2/5 rating, suggesting significant dissatisfaction. The feedback highlights issues with the state of disrepair in classrooms, hostels, and labs, alongside concerns about poor sanitation and overcrowded living conditions.
The single review is positive, rating the university 4/5. Feedback highlights the freshness of a new institution with modern curriculum and infrastructure, while noting necessary ongoing expansion for facilities.
With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. The feedback highlights exceptional professors who truly cared, indicating highly positive sentiment.
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
I spent 6 months at Keimyung some years ago. It is in the south (Daegu/Teagu), around 3 hours ride away from Seoul. What I enjoyed most of the stay was that international students were placed in an "English speaking house" and paired with a Korean room mate. I'm still friends with my room mate. The classes were not as difficult as at my home university. I still fondly remember a class in international communication. The teacher was very welcoming to the discussion international students created. He invited us also for a farewell dinner. I also had the chance to take courses such as Korean language (I think you for sure should do that), and Taekwondo (that was just for the fun). In all, the study load allowed for ample travel time and gave insights into a different culture I would not have gained while staying in the Netherlands. The campus has everything you need to survive. My home university doesn't have a campus so this was a new experience for me. Directly outside the university walls were many little shops and bars. The university had a curfew, but we - the group of 20 international students - ignored it. Some aspects were very traditional for western students (no person of a different gender in your room, be back by 11pm). But these were just different experiences and helped me - as a young woman - to discover the values and norms I espouse to.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classrooms, hostels, and labs are in a state of disrepair, with broken windows, leaking roofs, and cracked walls. Toilets are often unusable due to filth, blocked sewage, or lack of running water. Hostels may be overcrowded and dirty. Low Morale both students and staff feel demoralized, unmotivated, and detached from the institution’s success. Lack of Innovation,No initiatives for growth, research, or community development. The institution stagnates with no vision for improvement.
As a new institution, ongoing expansion and development remain necessary—especially for facilities, student housing, and research spaces. Visuals show initial campuses but likely still maturing. Being a newly established university brings freshness: newer infrastructure, modern curriculum design, and the energy of expansion .
Nothing to show
