Hochschule Osnabrück vs Queen's University Belfast - QUB vs Hampden – Sydney College vs Chittagong Medical University vs Australian College of Business and Technology - acbt

Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Abbottabad University Of Science And Technology (4.50)
Hochschule Osnabrück: wins 0/7 categories
Queen's University Belfast - QUB: wins 3/7 categories
Hampden – Sydney College: wins 0/7 categories
Chittagong Medical University: wins 0/7 categories
Australian College of Business and Technology - acbt: wins 0/7 categories
Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Abbottabad University Of Science And Technology: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Osnabrück, Germany
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: School of Education
Belfast, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
59 reviews
×
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Hampden Sydney, Virginia, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Chittagong, Bangladesh
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.37
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.00
4.27
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Professors
4.50
4.35
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.00
4.14
Win
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
Not rated
2.50
Student life
4.00
4.31
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Win
Value
4.00
4.21
Win
Not rated
3.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.50
4.19
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful and dedicated staff & faculty
  • +Comfortable, modern facilities and dream library
  • +Great city for university experience
  • +Practical, hands-on learning experiences
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Valuable real-world experience opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Quality education and affordable tuition
  • +Cooperative and highly skilled staff
  • +Positive and best-in-class environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a significant concern.
  • -Outdated curriculum and insufficient practical preparation for the workforce.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Students are frustrated by administrative and management issues.
  • -They find the facilities outdated and lacking in necessary resources.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners high marks for its facilities and professors, both receiving a commendable 4.5 out of 5. Student life, location, and internationality are also well-regarded, scoring a solid 4. The area requiring the most improvement is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5, suggesting room for development in this aspect.

Across multiple categories, this institution garners favorable reviews. Facilities emerge as a standout area, closely followed by professors and student life, all receiving scores above 4.3. Accommodation and internationality represent the lower end of the spectrum, though still rated positively, with value also falling within the mid-4 range.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners excellent scores for its facilities and professors, both receiving perfect marks. Its location and student life also stand out positively. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent the weakest aspects, with significantly lower ratings. The overall value of the university is rated quite well, suggesting a positive return for students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a great city for university, comfortable and modern buildings, and helpful professors and staff. The library is particularly praised.

Most reviews (approximately 98.3%) are positive, highlighting well-structured modules, approachable lecturers, and a welcoming campus environment. A small percentage of feedback noted outdated course content.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 average rating from 2 reviews, this university is highly praised. All feedback was positive, with students highlighting quality education, cooperative staff, and a great environment.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
34%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
0%
51%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
50%
14%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Exploring Cloud Computing: A Game-Changer

The Cloud Computing module was one of the highlights of my course at Queen’s. It covered the fundamentals of AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud in detail. The best part was the group project where we designed and deployed our own cloud-based application. The hands-on experience was invaluable, and the support from the faculty was excellent. I would highly recommend this module to anyone interested in this field.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close