Vietnam National University vs Hanoi Law University vs Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW vs University of Transport and Communications vs University of Engineering and Technology - UET

Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam (5.00)
Vietnam National University: wins 0/6 categories
Hanoi Law University: wins 0/6 categories
Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW: wins 0/6 categories
University of Transport and Communications: wins 0/6 categories
University of Engineering and Technology - UET: wins 0/6 categories
British University Vietnam - BUV: wins 2/6 categories
Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam: wins 4/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: School of Law
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: BSc Computer Science (awarded by University of Staffordshire)
Best programme: American Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.69
Win
4.00
Location
4.75
4.50
2.00
4.00
4.00
4.20
5.00
Win
Professors
4.40
5.00
3.00
4.00
4.50
4.55
5.00
Internationality
4.00
4.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
4.07
5.00
Win
Student life
4.00
4.25
3.00
3.00
3.50
4.40
5.00
Win
Value
4.00
4.75
3.00
3.00
4.50
4.48
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.25
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.33
Win
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers with practical insights
  • +Strong international cooperation network and reputable faculty
  • +High quality of education with unique training models
  • +Excellent professors and academic rigor
  • +High-quality facilities and resources
  • +Strong career focus and supportive environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable and encouraging staff
  • +Strong academic reputation and graduate success
  • +Emphasis on practical, innovation-based learning
  • +Modern campus & supportive international environment
  • +Qualified & passionate faculty
  • +Affordable British-standard education
  • +Excellent teachers and learning environment
  • +Valuable academic knowledge gained
  • +Positive social experience
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support for students is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
  • -Course content and delivery methods are frequently criticized as uninspiring or irrelevant.
  • -Lack of professor support and engagement with student curiosity.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its **location**, which received a near-perfect rating of 4.75. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.4. While many aspects, including facilities, student life, and internationality, achieved a solid 4, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.25. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with a few key strengths.

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **professors (5)** and **value (4.75)**. It also scores very well for **location (4.5)** and **student life (4.25)**. While still strong, areas like **facilities (4)**, **accommodation (4)**, and **internationality (4)** received slightly lower, though still positive, marks.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution receives strong marks from students. Its professors and value proposition are particularly well-regarded, both earning 4.5 stars. Facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality are also rated favorably at 4 stars each. The student life aspect received the lowest score, at 3.5 stars, representing the sole area for potential improvement.

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. Professors also receive commendation for their quality. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which scored the lowest among the surveyed aspects. Student life, accommodation, and value all demonstrate solid, above-average performance, alongside a respectable location rating.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its faculty, location, student life, and international appeal, all receiving perfect scores. Value for money is also rated highly. The only area not achieving a top rating is facilities and accommodation, both scoring a solid four out of five.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average rating from 6 reviews, university students praise lecturers' passion and expertise, alongside strong international cooperation (~83% positive). Some note outdated technology integration and course content.

With a 4.5/5 rating from 4 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight top-notch facilities and experienced, dedicated professors. Some mention a heavy workload and administrative process slowness.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.5 out of 5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight well-educated staff and a strong academic reputation. Some suggestions include improving academic collaboration with industry and incorporating more practical, innovation-based projects.

With 4.45 stars from 42 reviews, most students praise the modern campus, supportive, qualified international faculty, and friendly, diverse student body. One review cited a lack of in-depth professor support.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of reviews being 4–5 stars. Students highlight excellent lecturers and a great environment as key strengths, with an average rating of 5/5.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
0%
50%
57%
100%
4★
33%
50%
0%
0%
50%
33%
0%
3★
17%
0%
100%
100%
0%
7%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

BUV - The Engagement Hub

As a Chinese international student at BUV, I’ve had a wonderful experience. The students, teachers, and staff are always so friendly and ready to help with anything. There are so many clubs and activities, from skill-building workshops to just-for-fun events, and it feels like there’s something for everyone. These activities have helped me learn new things and make great friends. BUV is not just about academics it’s also a vibrant community where I feel supported and engaged.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close